Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Questions in Early Modern English pamphlets

Bibliographic Data

ID12821499
AuthorsClaudia Claridge (0000-0003-4785-3222, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume6
Issue1
Pages133-168
Publication date2005-02-22
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Historical Pragmatics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1566-5852 • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/jhp.6.1.07cla
OpenAlexW2079605524
LanguageEN
Citations received4

The paper explores the functions and distribution of questions in the Lampeter Corpus of Early Modern English Tracts , a 1.1 million-word corpus of pamphlets written between 1640 and 1740. Pamphlets are a highly interactive medium with a mostly persuasive function. Thus it is not surprising that pamphlet authors exhibit a critical and inquisitive attitude, which shows itself also in the explicit posing of questions. The questions can be sorted according to function into six major groupings: (i) introducing new information, (ii) provoking reader involvement, (iii) marking authorial emphasis, (iv) getting or focusing attention, (v) supporting the argumentation (backed by a number of conducive features), and (vi) exerting control. Of these, argumentation is clearly the dominant function, while reader involvement enhances the persuasive effect. Statistical analysis reveals questions to be more common in pamphlets, in particular highly contentious religious and political tracts, than in most other monologic texts

Argumentation theory · Art · Emphasis (telecommunications · Function (biology · Linguistics · Literature · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Law · Lexicography and Language Studies · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Register, Genre, and Style

    Open Access•Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad•Register, Genre, and Style•2009

  • Register, Genre, and Style

    Open Access•Douglas Biber, Susan Conrad•Register, Genre, and Style•2019

  • Who’s speaking for whom

    Open Access•Mingjian Xiang, Esther Pascual et al.•Journal of Historical Pragmatics•2022

  • But There Were No Broken Legs”

    Jan Chovanec•Journal of Historical Pragmatics•2014

Citations per year0.24
Citation span2009 - 2022 (14)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae