We had like to have been killed by thunder & lightning”

The semantic and pragmatic history of a construction that like to disappeared

Bibliographic Data

ID12821644
AuthorsMerja Kytö (0000-0002-7877-5522, corresponding author), Suzanne Romaine (0000-0002-0746-9704)
Year2005
Volume6
Issue1
Pages1-35
Publication date2005-02-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Historical Pragmatics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1566-5852 • E-ISSN: 1569-9854
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1075/jhp.6.1.02kyt
OpenAlexW2027935929
LanguageEN
Citations received6

This article discusses the semantic and pragmatic history of a grammatical construction consisting of a form of Be/Have + like followed by an infinitival verb form, which became obsolete in Standard English in the nineteenth century, but still survives in some regional varieties of British and American English, e.g. she liketa had a heart attack . It provides an example of a grammatical category that Kuteva (1998) has called “action narrowly averted” (ANA or avertive) with the meaning ‘on the verge of V-ing, but did not V’. Using a corpus of texts covering the last six centuries, we document the historical circumstances under which the avertive meaning emerged via invited inferences of counterfactuality drawn in the specific discourse context of predictive conditional constructions

Action (physics · Archaeology · Art · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Geography · Linguistics · Literature · Meaning (existential · Meteorology · Original meaning · Physics · Thunder · Verb · History · Lexicography and Language Studies · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub