Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Triggering Procedure of the International Criminal Court, Procedural Treatment of the Principle of Complementarity, and the Role of Office of the Prosecutor

Bibliographic Data

ID12821912
AuthorsHéctor Olasolo (0000-0001-9724-0163, Colciencias, corresponding author)
Year2005
Volume5
Issue1
Pages121-146
Publication date2005-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Criminal Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1567-536X • E-ISSN: 1571-8123
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/1571812053320129
OpenAlexW2050090869
LanguageEN
Citations received2

This article addresses the most fundamental procedural issues arising from Arts. 13, 14, 15, 18 and 53(1), (2) and (4) of the ICC Statute (hereinafter “the Rome Statute” or “RS”). It first analyses the reasons why the proceedings provided for in those articles constitute, referred to in this article as “Triggering Procedure”, within the complex procedural system provided for in the ICC Statute, an autonomous procedure whose object, parties and proceedings are perfectly distinguishable from the object, parties and proceedings of the Criminal and Civil Procedures. Once the relationship between the Triggering Procedure and the Criminal and Civil Procedures is introduced, the article analyses the procedural treatment of the principle of complementarity in the different procedures provided for in the ICC Statute. Finally, the last part of the article brie fly addresses the key role of the Of fice of the Prosecutor in the Triggering Procedure, and the duties imposed upon the competent Chamber of the Court to control, propio motu or at the request of a party to the proceedings, that the Of fice of the Prosecutor is acting within the powers granted to it by the RS and fully respecting the substantive and procedural standards set out by the RS

Civil procedure · Complementarity (molecular biology · Criminal court · Criminal law · Criminal procedure · International law · Object (grammar · Political science · Procedural law · Proportionality (law · Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court · Statute · Statute of limitations · Computer Science · European and International Law Studies · International Arbitration and Investment Law · International Law and Human Rights · Law

  • The International Criminal Court’s Ad Hoc Jurisdiction Revisited

    Open Access•Carsten Stahn, Mohamed M El Zeidy et al.•American Journal of International…•2005

  • Discretion and State Influence at the International Criminal Court

    Open Access•David Bosco•American Journal of International…•2017

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0.1
Citation span2005 - 2017 (13)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae