Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Giving Priority to Sex Crime Prosecutions

The Philosophical Foundations of a Feminist Agenda

Bibliographic Data

ID12822241
AuthorsMargaret M deGuzman (0000-0002-6367-8252, Philadelphia University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume11
Issue3
Pages515-528
Publication date2011-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Criminal Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1567-536X • E-ISSN: 1571-8123
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/157181211x576393
OpenAlexW1975229642
LanguageEN
Citations received1

In light of serious resource constraints, international criminal courts are required to select a small number of crimes for prosecution, leaving others to national courts or, more often, impunity. In recent years, feminists have advocated that such courts give priority to prosecuting sex crimes even at the expense of other serious crimes, including those involving killing. Many international prosecutors have heeded this call, placing special emphasis on the prosecution of sex crimes. At the same time, empirical evidence shows that many people consider sex crimes less serious than crimes resulting in death. There is thus a need to ground the selection of sex crimes for prosecution in the purposes of international criminal law. This essay examines the four primary philosophical bases advanced for international prosecutions – retribution, deterrence, expressivism, and restorative justice – to determine how they inform decisions whether to give priority to sex crime prosecutions. It concludes that retribution and deterrence support such selections at least some of the time, and expressivism and restorative justice provide an even stronger foundation for giving priority to sex crimes

Criminal justice · Criminology · Deterrence (psychology · Economic Justice · Expressivism · Human rights · Impunity · Political science · Restorative justice · Retributive justice · Sociology · Gender, Security, and Conflict · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

  • (In)Compatible Visions of Justice? Personal Culpability and Gender Justice at the ICC

    Open Access•Liana Georgieva Minkova•Politics & Gender•2022

Citations per year0.25
Citation span2022 - 2022 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae