The Ugandan Government Triggers the First Test of the Complementarity Principle

The Ugandan referral of its situation to the ICC raises some interesting legal issues that merit examination. As demonstrated in the current study, the acts committed during the current con flict in Uganda meet the requirements of the ICC jurisdiction ratione materiae, however, the problem remains that most of the acts were committed or were initiated before the Statute's entry into force. As the Court has a speci fied temporal jurisdiction, it is clear that the Court would lack jurisdiction over those acts committed before July 1, 2002. However, the question that remains is whether acts that commenced before the July 1, 2002 and continue after that date would be considered by the Court.Given the fact that Uganda is both the territorial state and the state of nationality (as deduced from section 1.1) – an unanticipated situation, some legal arguments come into play. The main issue that arises is that the self-referral implies a sort of waiver of the State to exercise complementarity. Would this be legally acceptable? And what are the consequences if the Court accepted this waiver? To what extent does such acceptance affect other admissibility provisions including the application of Article 17

Complementarity (molecular biology · Double jeopardy · Family medicine · Jurisdiction · Political science · Referral · State (computer science · Statute · Waiver · Human Rights and Development · International Environmental Law and Policies · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Medicine

• State Co-operation and International Criminal Court Bargaining Influence in the Arrest and the Surrender of Suspects

  Open Access•Steven D Roper, Lilian A Barria•Leiden Journal of International Law•2008

  Add to list

• The International Criminal Court’s Ad Hoc Jurisdiction Revisited

  Open Access•Carsten Stahn, Mohamed M El Zeidy et al.•American Journal of International…•2005

  Add to list