Peering behind the ‘Institutional Veil’ to Assess State Behaviour in the Security Council
Does/Should icc Membership Make a Difference
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12822304 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Frédéric Mégret (0000-0002-1220-4903, McGill University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 938-978 |
| Publication date | 2019-11-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Criminal Law Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1567-536X • E-ISSN: 1571-8123 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15718123-01906007 |
| OpenAlex | W2991588150 |
| Language | EN |
A considerable amount of literature exists on whether the Security Council’s actions towards the International Criminal Court ( icc ) as such are broadly consonant with the Rome Statute and the UN Charter. That literature, however, tends to treat the Security Council, and the United Nations with it, as a single bloc, and to judge the legality of its behaviour entirely independently from that of individual Security Council members in the Council. In revisiting these debates, this article examines the record of states in the Security Council in relation to the icc from the point of view of international law as a productive angle to understand how states reconcile various obligations of ‘good citizenship’ vis-à-vis international institutions
Charter · Citizenship · Criminal court · International law · Political science · Politics · Principle of legality · Security council · Sociology · State (computer science · Statute · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |