Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Peering behind the ‘Institutional Veil’ to Assess State Behaviour in the Security Council

Does/Should icc Membership Make a Difference

Bibliographic Data

ID12822304
AuthorsFrédéric Mégret (0000-0002-1220-4903, McGill University, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume19
Issue6
Pages938-978
Publication date2019-11-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Criminal Law Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1567-536X • E-ISSN: 1571-8123
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/15718123-01906007
OpenAlexW2991588150
LanguageEN

A considerable amount of literature exists on whether the Security Council’s actions towards the International Criminal Court ( icc ) as such are broadly consonant with the Rome Statute and the UN Charter. That literature, however, tends to treat the Security Council, and the United Nations with it, as a single bloc, and to judge the legality of its behaviour entirely independently from that of individual Security Council members in the Council. In revisiting these debates, this article examines the record of states in the Security Council in relation to the icc from the point of view of international law as a productive angle to understand how states reconcile various obligations of ‘good citizenship’ vis-à-vis international institutions

Charter · Citizenship · Criminal court · International law · Political science · Politics · Principle of legality · Security council · Sociology · State (computer science · Statute · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae