Rules, Games, and the Axiological Foundations of (International) Criminal Law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12822386 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Leo Zaibert (0000-0002-0921-2777, Union College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 346-360 |
| Publication date | 2016-02-17 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Criminal Law Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1567-536X • E-ISSN: 1571-8123 |
| Publisher | Brill (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15718123-01602007 |
| OpenAlex | W2326105228 |
| Language | EN |
International law has often been seen with scepticism, at least when contrasted against domestic law. International criminal law may suffer the same fate unless we reject a certain tendency to understand the role and functioning of any legal system in reductive and mechanistic terms. This tendency – a remnant from positivism – sees the law as modelled on games, and on their constitutive rules. I examine here a defense of this positivistic, narrow approach by prominent (domestic) criminal law theorists, and suggest reasons why international criminal law, in particular, should avoid it
Criminal law · Epistemology · International law · Municipal law · Political science · Positivism · Public law · Skepticism · Sociology · Free Will and Agency · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Highly cited | No |
|---|