Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Still struggling with the governance of interprofessional elderly care in mandated collaboratives

A qualitative study

Bibliographic Data

ID12825307
AuthorsRabab Chrifou (0000-0001-9837-0963, Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author), Jozé Braspenning (0000-0003-0800-0630, Radboud University Medical Center), Kor Grit (0000-0001-5167-4265), Hanna Stalenhoef (Erasmus University Rotterdam)
Year2023
Volume23
IssueS1
Pages91-91
Publication date2023-12-28
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Integrated Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1568-4156 • E-ISSN: 1568-4156
PublisherUbiquity Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.5334/ijic.icic23350
OpenAlexW4390941953
LanguageEN

Background: Governing interprofessional elderly care requires the commitment of many different organisations connected in mandated collaboratives. Research over a decade ago showed that the governance relied on clan-based mechanisms, while lacking formal rules and incentives for collaborations. Awareness and reflection were seen as first steps towards progression. We aim to re-identify critical governance features of contemporary mandated collaboratives by discussing cases introduced by the healthcare professionals and managers themselves. Methods: Qualitative research took place from November 2019 to November 2020 in the Netherlands. First, the general setting of integrated elderly care was explored by interviewing healthcare managers and professionals (n=6). Second, in-depth interviews (n=24) were conducted with two different regional mandated collaboratives to learn more about critical governance features. The interviews were thematically analysed by the project team (authors) to synthesise the results and then were validated during a focus group. Results: Little progress has been made in the governance of mandated collaboratives. The degree of formalization is kept low and the guiding principles of governance are trust and leadership. This approach meant that little attention is paid to the negotiation of interests, which makes it more difficult to implement the innovations in a sustainable manner. Moreover, the necessary resources are often lacking for the desired innovations. The fact that the mandated collaboratives are to a limited extent linked to the political or system level makes longer-term decisions and structural financing more difficult. Conclusions: Although the reported cases are Dutch, the international scientific discussion is in line with our empirical results and is probably not limited to elderly care. Mandated collaboratives emerge to govern interprofessional elderly care, but after more than 10 years of international experience the mandated collaboratives still struggle to strike the right balance between formalization, trust and leadership. This makes it difficult to find available resources and to realize three-fold connectivity (care, organisation and system level). A more fundamental debate about our governance expectations of mandated collaboratives is needed to make focused progress

Business · Corporate governance · Focus group · Health care · Incentive · Negotiation · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Sociology · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Interprofessional Education and Collaboration

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae