Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding the audience

Improving the impact of public performance reporting on quality of care

Bibliographic Data

ID12828006
AuthorsMargaret Kelaher (0000-0002-9899-858X, The University of Melbourne), Rachel Canaway (0000-0003-0937-575X, The University of Melbourne), Marie Bismark (0000-0003-0114-2388, The University of Melbourne), David Dunt (0000-0001-8450-7949, The University of Melbourne, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume17
Issue3
Pages112-112
Publication date2017-07-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Integrated Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1568-4156 • E-ISSN: 1568-4156
PublisherUbiquity Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.5334/ijic.3224
OpenAlexW2735086886
LanguageEN

Introduction: Despite its’ promise public performance reporting has had little impact on improving quality of care for consumers. In this study we examine consumer advocates, purchasers and providers’ understanding of public performance reporting and how it contributes to quality of care. The aim of the study is to improve the impact of public performance on quality of care.Theory: Public performance reporting is hypothesised to improve quality of care by eliciting organisational response to improve quality or by leading consumers to select away from poor quality services.Methods: We conducted 41semi-structured interviews nationally. The aim of the study was to examine differences in perceptions of the aims, implementation and impact public performance reporting. Data was transcribed and themes were analysed using NVivo.Results: The study revealed that consumers, providers and purchasers share similar perceptions of the goals of public performance reporting. However they have very different views about the extent to which to current public performance reporting is likely to meet the needs of consumers.Discussion: While consumers are supportive of public performance reporting current iterations are unlikely to influence either public perceptions of health services or consumer choice. Developing fit for purpose reporting is likely to improve the extent to which public performance reporting will improve quality of care.Conclusions: Overall the views of all respondents highlighted the need to better target publically reported information to inform the actions of the intended audience.Lessons learned: Public performance reporting is currently driven by what is most consistently reported at a national level. While this facilitated implementation it may undermined the perceived benefits of the enterprise.Limitations: Findings are health system specific.Suggestions for future research: We are conducting a meta-analysis and studies with medical directors, GPs and consumers to better understand how theory around public performance reporting translates into practice

Business · Health care · Perception · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Quality management · Service (business · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Psychology · Marketing

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae