Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Key drivers of payment reform in population health management

Lessons from nine Dutch pioneer sites

Bibliographic Data

ID12830591
AuthorsEline F De Vries (0000-0002-1336-4327, Tilburg University, corresponding author), Jeroen N Struijs (0000-0002-7493-6720), Hanneke W Drewes (0000-0001-5253-6470), Richard Heijink (0000-0001-9669-1034, Dutch Healthcare Authority), CAROLINE A BAAN (0000-0002-6183-7627, Tilburg University)
Year2017
Volume17
Issue5
Pages129-129
Publication date2017-10-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Integrated Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1568-4156 • E-ISSN: 1568-4156
PublisherUbiquity Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.5334/ijic.3437
OpenAlexW2765400399
LanguageEN

Introduction: Population health management (PHM) initiatives aim to improve health outcomes and quality of care, while slowing down cost growth (Triple Aim) for a prespecified population. In theory, a key precondition for successful PHM is to redesign provider payment schemes by shifting away from the classic fee-for-service payment system. Our objective is to gain insight in the role that payment reforms play in practice, focusing on current PHM initiatives within the nine Dutch pioneer sites.Methods: Interviews were conducted with at least two key representatives (e.g. health insurers and providers) involved in each of the nine pioneer sites. Additionally, we studied documentation published by the pioneer sites. In the interviews, we discussed 1) which alternative payments structures have been implemented (pay-for-performance, shared savings, bundled payments, capitation), 2) the key design elements of these payment structures (scope, contract duration, risk mitigation, benchmark, accountability, data need, quality indicators, financing structure), and 3) which barriers and successes have been experienced by implementing the alternative payment structures. Interviews are held during the period nov 2016 – jan 2017 and are analysed with MaxQda afterwards.Results: Preliminary results show that payment reforms seem to be implemented to some extent. As such, shared savings have been introduced, mainly in pharmacy settings. Additionally, efforts have been made to negotiate lump sum payments with hospitals to stimulate substitution towards primary care. At the ICIC 2017 conference, the final results, including the experienced barriers and successes, will be presented.Discussion and conclusion: As this study will reveal the role that payment reforms play in practice in the nine Dutch pioneer sites, it will provide useful information for policy makers who are interested in stimulating further transition in two ways. First, it may be used to anticipate on barriers that are experienced by the field. Second, successes may be extended to other sites

Accountability · Actuarial science · Business · Capitation · Documentation · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Payment · Political science · Population · Computer Science · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Finance

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae