Telehomecare technology across sectors

Claims of jurisdiction and emerging controversies

Bibliographic Data

ID12830722
AuthorsBirthe Dinesen (0000-0001-5893-9676, Aalborg University, corresponding author), Jeppe Gustafsson, Christian Nøhr (0000-0003-1299-7365), Stig KjærAndersen, Holger Sejersen, Egon Toft (0000-0001-6423-9692)
Year2007
Volume7
Issue4
Pagese43-e43
Publication date2007-11-21
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Integrated Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1568-4156 • E-ISSN: 1568-4156
PublisherUbiquity Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.5334/ijic.217
PMID18043726
OpenAlexW1590683224
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited6

The identification of such controversies and differences in the design and implementation process of the concept of home hospitalisation for heart patients by means of telehomecare technology can contribute to the uncovering of new knowledge. These issues should be taken into account when initiating a telehomecare project and implementing telehomecare technology. Technology in a network and across inter-professional relations poses a challenge to this new field. There is a particular need to precisely define the claims of jurisdiction, and the accompanying controversies that can arise related to knowledge technologies, network visions and network architecture

Actor–network theory · Data science · Health care · Identification (biology · Jurisdiction · Knowledge management · Political science · Process (computing · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Vision · Computer Science · Healthcare Systems and Technology · Law · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access