Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Translation of the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool

Bibliographic Data

ID12832638
AuthorsAlaa Dayekh (0000-0002-1522-2592, corresponding author), A Pakai (0000-0002-2849-1310)
Year2026
Volume26
IssueS1
Pages559-559
Publication date2026-03-24
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Integrated Care (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1568-4156 • E-ISSN: 1568-4156
PublisherUbiquity Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.5334/ijic.icic25559
OpenAlexW7140283081
LanguageEN

Background: Without reliable evaluation tools, ensuring engagement quality, evaluating engagement results, adopting organizational learning, and proving commitment to public funds is difficult. The PPEET was designed to assess and improve excellence in patient and public engagement (PPE) initiatives across various health system organizations. Since language significantly affects the psychometric properties of research instruments, validated versions of these instruments are crucial. This study will be the first to validate the translation of PPEET into Arabic to track its impact on the healthcare systems of Lebanon and other Arabic-speaking countries. Methods: This is a mixed method qualitative and quantitative cross-sectional validity and reliability study. We translated the four surveys into Arabic using the ‘forward and backward translation’ method. We tested the validity by interviewing 10 bilingual healthcare experts. The internal consistency reliability was measured with Cronbach’s alpha and correlation coefficient analysis. Results: Healthcare experts, who were consulted for the face validity of the translated PPEET, had an average age of 34.7 ± 7.9 years with mean years of work experience of 8.9 ± 6.9. the majority were females and held post-graduate degrees. Professionals reported the average clarity percentage for all translated surveys as 96.42%. Participants suggested minor modifications to the final translated version that resulted from the face validity. Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for Participants’ questionnaire module A, Participants’ questionnaire module B, Project, and organization questionnaire, were 0.788, 0.891, 0.946, and 0.894, respectively. Only the Final thoughts of participants’ questionnaire module A showed poor internal consistency due to small number of participants. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the Arabic version of the PPEET is a valid and reliable tool. A large-scale sample would be beneficial for further analysis

Arabic · CLARITY · Cronbach's alpha · Face validity · Health care · Interview · Reliability (semiconductor · Validity · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae