New speakers of new and old languages

An investigation into the gap between language practices and language policy

Bibliographic Data

ID12834226
AuthorsMassimiliano Spotti (0000-0003-2907-2174, Tilburg University, corresponding author), Sjaak Kroon (0000-0002-3270-7698, Tilburg University), Jinling Li (0000-0001-7238-3889, Tilburg University)
Year2019
Volume18
Issue4
Pages535-551
Publication date2019-03-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLanguage Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1568-4555 • E-ISSN: 1573-1863
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s10993-018-9503-5
OpenAlexW2919385256
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited22

This paper explores the intersection of new speakers in conditions of globalisation led mobility and it investigates the implications the phenomena may have for language policy making. It first describes two historical phases in language policy development that are closely related to a sociolinguistics of stability. In this, it criticises how present-day language policy is attached to specific time and space constraints whose focus is a by now outdated concept of language and of speaker as its prescriptive objects—thus leading institutional language policies to not being ‘in sync’ with contemporary new speakers’ socio- and geo-political movements and developments. This proposition is illustrated in two case studies, both located in the Netherlands and dealing with the language practices and connected policies of two types of new speakers. The first case deals with the experiences of asylum seekers being engaged with ‘techno-literacies’. That is asylum seekers being part of ICT assisted classes for civic integration through the learning of Dutch (new speakers of a new language, learning through new means of language learning). The second case deals with Chinese students who are fully proficient in Dutch, attending language heritage classes for learning Mandarin through book based lessons (new speakers of an old language, learning through old means of language learning). In both cases, the observed language practices and meta-pragmatic judgements of the individual language users elect them as initiators of bottom-up sociolinguistic change that, while offering grassroots solutions for local challenges, also plays a role as local evidence for informing future top-down language policy development

Comprehension approach · First language · Foreign language · Grassroots · Language acquisition · Language assessment · Language education · Language industry · Language pedagogy · Language policy · Linguistics · Localism · Mandarin Chinese · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Sociolinguistics · Sociology · Sociology of language · Law · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy · Second Language Learning and Teaching

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access