Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Project management logics for agile public strategic management

Propositions from the literature and a research agenda

Bibliographic Data

ID12839199
AuthorsAndrea Bonomi Savignon (0000-0003-0677-3381, University of Rome Tor Vergata), Lorenzo Costumato (0000-0002-5027-7636, University of Rome Tor Vergata, corresponding author)
EditorsCaroline Fischer (0000-0001-5870-4498), Oliver Neumann (0000-0002-0988-9729)
Year2024
Volume29
Issue2
Pages153-178
Publication date2024-05-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInformation Polity (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1875-8754 • E-ISSN: 1570-1255
PublisherIOS Press (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.3233/ip-230061
OpenAlexW4399211370
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited85

In this paper, we call for an integration of project management logics within the now mature field of public strategic management, to analyze the potential contribution of projects in terms of increased strategic agility, in a context where traditional strategic planning and management tools and approaches are increasingly seen at risk of not being responsive enough to rapidly changing external conditions. To pursue this objective, we carry out a problematizing literature review on the two streams, by incorporating journal and book contributions from the last 30 years on Web of Science Database. 509 contributions have been quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed to answer two interconnected research questions: What is the state of the art in the literature on the interactions between project management and public strategic management? And, how can project management logics be integrated within traditional strategic planning and management processes in the public sector in order to achieve strategic agility? We find that, until today, public management literature has only sporadically dealt with the potential influence of project management logics on strategic management and, more in detail, strategy implementation. Furthermore, the review enables a discussion of five organizational drivers fostering an agile approach in public strategy implementation. Using a narrative approach, they then lead to the formulation of five researchable propositions. We conclude by proposing an updated model of the strategic planning and management cycle in the public sector, factoring in potential agile practices and feedback mechanisms induced by incorporating project logics in the implementation of strategy

Agile software development · Business · Context (archaeology · Economics · Knowledge management · Management · Management science · Process management · Project management · Strategic control · Strategic financial management · Strategic management · Strategic planning · Computer Science · Construction Project Management and Performance · Public Policy and Administration Research · Public-Private Partnership Projects · Marketing

  • Does Digital Transformation Rely on Collaborative Dynamics? A Case Study on the Italian Public Digital Strategy

    Open Access•Lorenzo Costumato, Andrea Bonomi Savignon et al.•Public Administration•2026

  • Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017

    Open Access•Kai Li, Jason Rollins et al.•Scientometrics•2018

  • Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research

    Open Access•Michel Callon, J Courtial et al.•Scientometrics•1991

  • Bibliometrix

    Open Access•Massimo Aria, Corrado Cuccurullo•Journal of Informetrics•2017

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Open Access•David Moher, Alessandro Liberati et al.•PLoS Medicine•2009

  • Governing long-term policy problems

    Open Access•Wieke Pot, Art Dewulf et al.•Public Management Review•2022

  • E-Government implementation challenges in small countries

    Open Access•Loukas Glyptis, Michael Christofi et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2020

  • Re-compartmentalizing local policies? The translation and mediation of European structural funds in Sweden

    Open Access•Dalia Mukhtar-Landgren, Morris Fred•Critical Policy Studies•2018

  • Wicked and less wicked problems

    Open Access•Jonathan Alford, John Alford et al.•Policy and Society•2017

  • Designing for robustness

    Open Access•Michael Howlett, Giliberto Capano et al.•Policy and Society•2018

  • Why e-government projects fail? An analysis of the Healthcare.gov website

    Open Access•Λεωνίδας Ανθόπουλος, Christopher G Reddick et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • Agile innovation management in government

    Open Access•Ines Mergel•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Critical issues pertaining to the planning and implementation of E-Government initiatives

    Open Access•Wade R Rose, Gerald Grant et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2009

  • Adaptive governance

    Open Access•Marijn Janssen, Haiko Van Der Voort•Government Information Quarterly•2016

  • Agile government

    Open Access•Ines Mergel, Yiwei Gong et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Performance-Based Contracting in Social Welfare Programs

    Open Access•Carolyn J Heinrich, Youseok Choi•The American Review of Public…•2007

  • Writing impactful reviews to rejuvenate public administration

    Open Access•Bert George, Brian T George et al.•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Project and Process Management of Public-Private Partnerships

    Open Access•Andreas Hagedorn Krogh, Svante Aasbjerg Thygesen•Administration & Society•2022

  • Successful Strategic Plan Implementation in Public Organizations

    Open Access•Bert George•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Public administration and politics meet turbulence

    Open Access•Christopher Ansell, Eva Sørensen et al.•Public Administration•2022

  • Public governance, agility and pandemics

    Open Access•Paul Joyce•International Review of…•2021

  • Portfolio management

    Open Access•Patrick Roberts, Lauren Hamilton Edwards•Public Administration Review•2023

  • Agile

    Open Access•Ines Mergel, Sukumar Ganapati et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector

    Open Access•Theodore H Poister•Public Administration Review•2010

  • Local government projectification in practice – a multiple institutional logic perspective

    Open Access•Morris Fred•Local Government Studies•2020

  • Studying Governance and Public Management

    L E Lynn, Carolyn J Heinrich et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2000

  • Incorporating agile practices in public sector IT management

    Maija Ylinen•Information Polity•2021

  • Policy implementation in the era of accelerating projectification

    Open Access•Christian Jensen, Staffan Johansson et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2018

  • What happens on the ground

    Open Access•Peter Hupe•Public Policy and Administration•2014

  • Governmentality Matters

    Open Access•Stewart Clegg, Stewart R Clegg et al.•Organization Studies•2002

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae