Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perceptions of Challenges Affecting Research Ethics Committees’ Members at Medical and Health Science Colleges in Omani and Jordanian Universities

Bibliographic Data

ID12839729
AuthorsOmar Al Omari (0000-0002-7614-1729, Sultan Qaboos University, corresponding author), Alhadi Khalaf (0000-0002-9958-0222, Kristianstad University), Wael Al Delaimy (University of California San Diego), Mohammad Al Qadire (0000-0001-7004-6782, Al al-Bayt University), Moawiah Khatatbeh (0000-0002-6299-6486, Yarmouk University), Imad Thultheen (An-Najah National University)
Year2021
Volume20
Issue2
Pages227-241
Publication date2021-04-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Academic Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1570-1727 • E-ISSN: 1572-8544
PublisherSpringer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1007/s10805-021-09410-8
OpenAlexW3153884430
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited24

In recent years there has been an increase in research conducted in the Middle East, with a corresponding increase in the challenges faced by members of the Research Ethics Committees (RECs). This study compares the structures of Omani and Jordanian RECs and investigates the perceptions of the challenges affecting the work of the REC members in Oman and Jordan. A convenience sample of 34 Omani and 66 Jordanian participants from 21 universities was recruited in this cross-sectional study. Almost 70% disagreed that the members of RECs are unqualified, providing comments without justification; half believed that members have limited experience in research, and almost three-quarters that they have different opinions regarding some ethical issues. No significant differences were found between Omani and Jordanian REC members regarding their perception of the challenges, except for the perception that reviewing proposals is a time-consuming task ( p = 0.048) and that multi-REC centres are less available ( p = 0.026). The regression model showed that there were significantly more male members of Jordanian RECs, and that Jordanian members were less likely to receive formal training. In conclusion, the current structure of RECs and the challenges faced by members need to be re-evaluated by decision makers to improve the overall quality of research activities, and to ensure that current REC members’ practices adhere to international standards

Family medicine · Medical education · Perception · Political science · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Sample (material · Work (physics · Academic integrity and plagiarism · Engineering · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Medicine · Psychology

  • A national survey of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding publication ethics standards among the members of research ethics committees of Iranian Universities of Medical Sciences

    Open Access•Amirhossein Mardani, Saeed Barzegari et al.•Research Ethics•2025

  • An Overview of King Hussein Cancer Center Institutional Review Board Over 12 Years (2009–2020), Successes and Challenges, Including Those Imposed by the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Linda Kateb, Sawsan El-Jayousi et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2022

  • Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects

    World Medical Association World Medical Association, World Medical Association•Jahrbuch für Wissenschaft und Ethik•2009

  • The introduction of research ethics review procedures at a university in South Africa

    Open Access•Simeon EH Davies•Research Ethics•2020

  • Clinical Research Law in Jordan

    Open Access•IBRAHIM RAMAHI, H Silverman•Developing World Bioethics•2009

  • Capacity Building of Ethics Review Committees Across Africa Based on the Results of a Comprehensive Needs Assessment Survey

    Open Access•ACEME NYIKA, WENCESLAUS KILAMA et al.•Developing World Bioethics•2009

  • Reassessing the Role of the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee

    Open Access•Merryn Ekberg•Journal of Academic Ethics•2012

  • Human Research Ethics Committees

    Open Access•M Guillemin, Lynn Gillam et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2012

  • Protecting” or “Policing”

    Open Access•Jihad Makhoul, Leila El-Alti et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2014

  • Perspectives of Egyptian Research Ethics Committees regarding Their Effective Functioning

    Open Access•Amal Matar, H Silverman•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2013

  • Enhancing Research Ethics Capacity in the Middle East

    Open Access•H Silverman, Hillary Edwards et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2013

  • Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Research Ethics Committees Among Health Care Faculty at Two Public Universities in Jordan

    Open Access•Nehad M Ayoub, Abeer M Qandil et al.•Journal of Empirical Research on…•2019

  • Justification and authority in institutional review board decision letters

    Open Access•Justin T Clapp, Katharine A Gleason et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae