Public Trust in Science
A Systematic Literature Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12839749 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kalypso Iordanou (0000-0001-5930-9393, University of Cyprus, corresponding author), Antonis C Antoniou (0000-0001-9223-3116, University of Cyprus), Maura De Vos (University of Cyprus) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Academic Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1570-1727 • E-ISSN: 1572-8544 |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10805-026-09732-5 |
| OpenAlex | W7134933249 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 43 |
This systematic literature review of factors influencing public trust in science provides insights for strengthening science-society relationships and informing responsible research practices. Our analysis of 124 empirical studies reveals multiple factors that are linked to trust in science, which we organize into three key categories: (a) Receiver—individual characteristics of the public, (b) Message—scientific information and its delivery, and (c) Source—scientists and the scientific method. Our synthesis demonstrates that trust in science is related to multiple factors, from individual factors (prior beliefs, attitudes, values, epistemic beliefs) to communication (such as channel credibility, ethics communication) and scientific practices (open science, replicability). Our findings have several important implications for research practice, science communication and education. Most notably, the findings highlight the pivotal role of research integrity in fostering and maintaining public trust in science, with scientists’ perceived integrity, epistemic practices that support transparency, and epistemic inclusion all being fundamentally interconnected in shaping public trust
Blind trust · Peer review · Public trust · Social trust · Systematic review · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Risk Perception and Management · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Trust in Science and the Science of Trust
More than Tuskegee
The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour
Construction and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers' Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness
The PRISMA 2020 statement
Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention
Trust and Antitrust
Consistent effects of science and scientist characteristics on public trust across political regimes
Science Advice in an Environment of Trust
Science-related populism
A systematic review of narrative interventions
Public trust and mistrust of climate science
Replication crisis = trust crisis? The effect of successful vs failed replications on laypeople’s trust in researchers and research
What are you assessing when you measure “trust” in scientists with a direct measure
Hot topics in science communication
Causal or spurious? The relationship of knowledge and attitudes to trust in science and technology
Communicating trust and trustworthiness through scientists’ biographies
Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures
Bridging the Divide
Responsible research, inequality in science and epistemic injustice
Epistemic inclusion
Public trust in science
The Role of Stewards of Trust in Facilitating Trust in Science
Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |