Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Op de snijtafel van de genderhistoricus. Androcentrisme in de historische demografie

Bibliographic Data

ID12841124
AuthorsA A P O Janssens (Radboud University Nijmegen, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue1
Pages53-76
Publication date2020-06-06
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTSEG/ Low Countries Journal of Social and Economic History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1572-1701 • E-ISSN: 2468-9068
PublisherInternational Institute of Social History (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.18352/tseg.1125
OpenAlexW3039396714
LanguageNL
References cited4

This article presents a discussion and analysis of the way in which the concept of gender is applied as an analytical category in the field of historical demography. Gender as an analytical category was introduced in the 1980s to reveal the social and cultural constructions of gender and power, and the way in which these gender constructions worked to marginalise women as a social group as well as making them invisible in mainstream history writing. After so many years the question arises to what extent gender mainstreaming has taken place in the practice of history writing and whether it has successfully pushed out former androcentric historical practices. I ask this question relating to the field of historical demography, and I do this by tracing gendered perspectives in all articles published in The History of the Family. An International Quarterly in all issues in five volumes: 2008, 2020, 2012, 2014 and 2016. All empirical articles in these issues were examined on whether and how the concept of gender was used. More androcentric analytical practices would lead to perspectives in which women would be regarded merely as bodies, appearing in variables such as ‘age at marriage’, rather than as agents of change or social actors. These latter roles would be reserved for men. Results show that in a majority of the publications authors do make use of the concept of gender. However, a content analysis shows that many of these articles use gender as an equivalent for sex, a practice which takes us back to the old biological perspectives on the differences between men and women. Still, the content analysis also shows that a considerable number of studies do make use of gender as an analytical category, thereby greatly enhancing the richness and complexity of approaches in the field. These studies shows that using gender as an analytical category in historical demography reduces one-dimensional functionalist and economistic perspectives on important demographic phenomena in the past

Field (mathematics · Gender history · Mainstream · Political science · Power (physics · Sociology · Gender Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Historical Gender and Feminism Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law

  • We weren't the sort that wanted intimacy every night”

    Simon Szreter, Kate Fisher•The History of the Family•2009

  • Policies and practices of fertility control under the state socialism

    Rada Drezgić•The History of the Family•2009

  • Low fertility and concurrent birth control policy in China

    Open Access•Q Jiang, Yixiao Liu•The History of the Family•2016

  • Reproductive health, birth control, and fertility change in Sweden, circa 1900–1940

    Sofia Kling•The History of the Family•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae