Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Superior minds’ and proportional representation

John Stuart Mill’s political elitism, then and now

Bibliographic Data

ID12845241
AuthorsJ C Laursen (0000-0003-0028-4149, corresponding author), Shaun Bowler (0000-0002-0739-6090)
Year2025
Issue60
Pages226-245
Publication date2025-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAraucaria (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1575-6823 • E-ISSN: 2340-2199
PublisherEditorial Universidad de Sevilla (PUBLISHER • ES)
DOI10.12795/araucaria.2025.i60.12
OpenAlexW4415954932
LanguageEN

There have been at least two general reasons for promotion of proportional representation in elections around the world.John Stuart Mill supported proportional representation in part because he thought it would make possible the election of better educated people to legislative assemblies, which would in turn make for better laws.Carl Andrae promoted it because he needed a method of avoiding the exclusion of minorities from legislative influence, or majority tyranny, in nineteenth century Denmark.In this article we bring out Mill's elitism, or preference for 'superior minds' and better educated people, in contrast to Andrae, who makes no judgment about the superiority of representation that proportional representation will create.In the years since their times, Andrae's

Politics · Legal and Social Philosophy · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Theory and Influence

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae