Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Contingent Necessity of the State

On the Irrelevance of Radical Critique

Bibliographic Data

ID12848236
AuthorsThor Hvidbak (Aarhus University, corresponding author)
Year2008
Volume9
Issue2
Pages121-147
Publication date2008-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDistinktion Journal of Social Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1600-910X • E-ISSN: 2159-9149
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1600910x.2008.9672967
OpenAlexW2004466766
LanguageEN
References cited31

This article explores the relation between violence and political order from the perspective of the state as an emergent political entity. Based upon a genealogy of raison d'État juxtaposing the accounts of mainly Luhmann and Foucault, it proposes to analyze the emergence of politics as an autonomous sphere and rationality, an art of government irrevocably tied to the state and its status as both an abstract regulatory idea (in the Kantian sense) as well as a set of concrete practices and institutions. The problem of state violence is discussed in relation to ideas of state necessity and the phenomenon of coup d'État. The article asserts that the question of state-induced exceptions can be given new perspective through a scrutiny of the 16th and 17th-century debates, where the issue was discussed with specific relation to the emerging state complex. The state formula evolved as a contingent necessity with increasing complexity and elaborate measures for contingency control. Political legitimacy is bound to the state and in a sense an internal construction of politics, a self-description which always can be deconstructed. However, critical deconstructive portrayals of contemporary political order as inherently violent or as a permanent state of exception fail to analyze the workings of this order; they overemphasize exceptions and misunderstand the point of contingent necessity. Taking Agamben as the most notable representative of such critique, this article contends that his speculative and ahistorical approach not only fails to understand basic features of societal order, but also risks political irrelevance due to its misplaced focus. KEYWORDS: AgambenFoucaultLuhmannpolitical orderpolitical violenceraison d'Étatstate formationstate of exception

Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Positive economics · State (computer science · Computer Science · Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics

  • Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft

    Niklas Luhmann•Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft•1997

  • Constitutionalism and the separation of powers

    M J C Vile•Constitutionalism and the…•1967

  • Law As A Social System

    N Luhmann•Law as a social system•2004

  • Discipline and Punish

    Michel Foucault, Simon Prebble•Surveiller et punir•2019

  • Hatred of democracy

    Jacques Rancière•Hatred of democracy•2007

  • The State of Exception

    Open Access•Giorgio Agamben•Politics, Metaphysics, and Death•2005

  • Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice

    David Carlson, Drucilla Cornell et al.•Deconstruction and the…•2016

  • Funktionen und Folgen formaler Organisation

    Open Access•N Luhmann•Schriften zur Organisation 5•2022

  • Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft

    Julian Müller, Ansgar Lorenz•Niklas Luhmann•2016

  • The Differentiation of Society

    N Luhmann, Charles Larmore et al.•Differentiation of Society•1982

  • Der Begriff des Politischen

    Carl Schmitt•Der Begriff des Politischen•2018

  • Political Theology

    Carl Schmitt, George Schwab et al.•Political Theology•2005

  • Jean Bodin

    Jean Bodin, Julian H Franklin•Bodin•1992

  • War without End(s)

    Andreas Herberg‐rothe, Jan Willem Honig•Distinktion Journal of Social…•2007

  • Survey Article

    Open Access•William E Scheuerman•Journal of Political Philosophy•2006

  • The New Spirit of Capitalism

    Open Access•Luc Boltanski, Eve Chiapello•International Journal of Politics…•2005

  • The Third Question

    N Luhmann•Journal of Law and Society•1988

  • Sovereignty and Its Discontents

    Open Access•Yeliz Turk•Modern Law Review•2005

  • Making Exceptions

    Open Access•Jens Bartelson•Political Theory•1997

  • From the King's House to the Reason of State

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu•Constellations•2004

  • Discipline and Punish

    Raffaella D’amico•Telos•1978

  • Teoria democrática e política comparada

    Open Access•Guillermo O’donnell•Dados•1999

  • Deconstruction as Second-Order Observing

    N Luhmann•New Literary History•1993

  • Homo Sacer

    Kalliopi Nikolopoulou, Giorgio Agamben et al.•SubStance•2000

  • The Prince

    Niccolò Machiavelli, Harvey C Mansfield•The Prince•1998

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae