An evental pandemic
Thinking the Covid-19 ‘event’ with Deleuze and Foucault
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 12848552 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jemima Repo (0000-0001-7598-6589, Newcastle University, autor correspondente), Hannah Richter (0000-0001-5680-6888, University of Hertfordshire) |
| Ano | 2022 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Fascículo | 2-3 |
| Páginas | 220-237 |
| Data de publicação | 2022-07-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Distinktion Journal of Social Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1600-910X • E-ISSN: 2159-9149 |
| Editora | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1600910x.2022.2086595 |
| OpenAlex | W4285395684 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 29 |
As COVID-19 swept the world it also became the subject of a quickly growing body of theoretical scholarship aimed at understanding the social, political and economic implications of the ‘pandemic event’. Taking a step back, this paper draws on Deleuze and Foucault to interrogate whether, and in what way, the COVID-19 pandemic can and should in fact be understood as an event. We first offer a structured overview of existing ‘pandemic theory’ where we highlight that the productivity unfolded by the pandemic event is here either politically or ontologically fixed. Against this background, we show that, in distinct ways, Deleuze’s and Foucault’s concepts of the event caution against reifying a pandemic event. Any political force the pandemic can unfold is always made after the fact, and is contingent on what is (counter-)effectuated from the pandemic, or which discursive dispersions intersect with and unfold from it. We argue for considering the pandemic as evental rather than an event – it is made up of events, and holds the potential to produce events. For critical theory, the significance of the pandemic event is thus in the first place methodological: it gives insight to how (post-)pandemic societies are produced, and where openings for the actualization of alternatives might lie
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Epistemology · Event (particle physics · Pandemic · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Global Security and Public Health · Law · Philosophy
Sartre, Foucault, and Historical Reason, Volume Two
Also sprach Zarathustra
Nietzsche and Philosophy
Biomedical Apparatuses or Conviviality
Tyranny vs. Freedom? On the Liberal Apparatus of Biopolitical Security
Being in Common at a Distance
Right Outta’ Nowhere
Reflections on Time and Politics
Deleuze's Rethinking of the Notion of Sense
Deleuze and the event(s)
The Time of the Political
The Becoming of the “Event”
We are doing better’
Expertise and the moral economies of austerity
Biopolitics, Essential Labor, and the Political-Economic Crises of Covid-19
The World Seen From Within
Politics in the Time of Covid
Deleuze and Foucault
Foucault Decoded
The Virocene Epoch
Pandemic
Mad for Foucault
Biopolitics in the Time of Coronavirus
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2023 - 2024 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |