How warfare has evolved – a humanitarian organization's perception
The case of the ICRC, 1863–1960
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12848715 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel Palmieri (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2015 |
| Volume | 97 |
| Issue | 900 |
| Pages | 985-998 |
| Publication date | 2015-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Review of the Red Cross (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1607-5889 • E-ISSN: 1816-3831 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1816383116000370 |
| OpenAlex | W2504776292 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
To understand how war is perceived and how it has evolved over time, we must first choose the right agent to study: one that is at once involved in the bellicosity, and yet keeps its distance. Such an agent will be better placed to maintain an objective and rational view of developments. The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) would seem to fit the bill. As a humanitarian organization that has been working with the victims of armed conflict for more than 153 years, the ICRC has plenty of experience of war, yet it preserves its ability to interpret critically in its capacity as non-belligerent. It is therefore in a position to grasp the evolution of mankind's oldest activity over one and a half centuries – a period during which warfare has undergone incredible and deadly transformations in conjunction with technological breakthroughs and the rise of extremist political ideologies. On top of this, the ICRC was itself, in its early days, made up of people who had experienced war in one way or another. Of the five members who decided to found the organization in February 1863, three had personally experienced armed violence to varying degrees. This fact also made the nascent organization uniquely entitled to voice its views on a subject of which it had empirical experience
Aesthetics · Belligerent · Business · Ideology · Perception · Period (music · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Subject (documents · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · Military History and Strategy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.38 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2018 - 2019 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |