John 21
24-25: A case of failed attestation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12857273 |
|---|---|
| Authors | D Francois Tolmie (0000-0002-4804-3523, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1996 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 420-426 |
| Publication date | 1996-04-21 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Verbum et Ecclesia (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1609-9982 • E-ISSN: 2074-7705 |
| Publisher | AOSIS (PUBLISHER • ZA) |
| DOI | 10.4102/ve.v17i2.528 |
| OpenAlex | W2070305024 |
| Language | EN |
John 21:24-25: A case of failed attestation In this article the tendency to interpret John 21:24-25 narratologically as a highly sophisticated and effective technique is disputed. Instead it is argued that the Beloved Disciple is identified in these verses as the real author of the Gospel and that the dominating function in John 21 :24-25 is the testimonial function (also known as the function of attestation). It is also argued that the intended effect of this junction is undermined by the awkward manner in which it is fulfilled
Advertising · Biology · Business · Epistemology · Function (biology · Gospel · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Testimonial · Theology · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Computer Science · Law · Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies · Philosophy · Theology and Canon Law Studies · Genetics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|