Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Benefitting from bibliometry

Bibliographic Data

ID12858428
AuthorsJarl Giske (0000-0001-5034-8177, University of Bergen, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume8
Pages79-81
Publication date2007-11-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthics in Science and Environmental Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1611-8014 • E-ISSN: 1863-5415
PublisherI nt er-R es ea rc h (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.3354/esep00075
OpenAlexW2077540228
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited4

ESEP Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics Contact the journal RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections ESEP 8:79-81 (2008) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00075 Benefitting from bibliometry Jarl Giske* Department of Biology, University of Bergen, Postboks 7803, 5020 Bergen, Norway *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT: Society has learned that there can be big pay-offs from science. Governments, private companies and funding agencies will therefore want to know whether their investments in research are well placed. As long as scientists ask for funding support, we must accept the right of these agencies to ask for proof of results. Within a department, the evaluation of performance may be one of several incentives for improving scientific quality and productivity. However, used alone, performance evaluation can lead to destructive competition and marginalization of potentially valuable staff members. Used in combination with research organisation and leadership, it may motivate many staff members. Results-based financing within a department should be used carefully. It should follow the setting of a clear research agenda, by the lowest-level leaders, and the organisation of the activity into groups. Only in groups with goals can the full potential of the staff in a department be mobilised to do more and better science. KEY WORDS: Bibliometry · Research group · Results-based financing Full text in pdf format PreviousNextCite this article as: Giske J (2008) Benefitting from bibliometry. Ethics Sci Environ Polit 8:79-81. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00075 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in ESEP Vol. 8, No. 1. Online publication date: June 03, 2008 Print ISSN: 1863-5415; Online ISSN: ISSN Copyright © 2008 Inter-Research

Business · Competition (biology · Economics · Incentive · Political science · Productivity · Public relations · Quality (philosophy · Innovation, Sustainability, Human-Machine Systems · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • The quantified university

    Open Access•M J Heron, Pauline Belford et al.•ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society•2016

  • Introduction Factors and Indices Are One Thing, Deciding Who Is Scholarly, Why They Are Scholarly, and the Relative Value of Their Scholarship Is Something Else Entirely

    Open Access•Howard I Browman, KI Stergiou•Ethics in Science and Environmental…•2008

  • Ambiguity, Bias, and Compromise

    Open Access•Peter A Todd•Environment and Planning A…•2009

  • Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts

    Open Access•Linda Butler•Research Policy•2003

  • Fatal attraction

    Open Access•Anthony F J van Raan•Scientometrics•2005

  • Entering the Century of the Environment

    Open Access•Jane Lubchenco•Science•1998

  • The 'National System of Innovation' in historical perspective

    Christopher Freeman•Cambridge Journal of Economics•1995

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2008 - 2016 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae