Verbal information transmission without communicative intention
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12859389 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Enikő Németh Т (0000-0001-8559-7229, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Publication date | 2008-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Intercultural Pragmatics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1612-295X • E-ISSN: 1613-365X |
| Publisher | De Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ip.2008.009 |
| OpenAlex | W2024208573 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
Language use and communication cannot be equated entirely, since verbal communication is not the only form of language use. There are several other kinds of language use including the use of language to inform, think, memorize, learn, take notes, play, sing for fun or in psycholinguistic experiments, as has been exemplified and argued for in some grammatical and pragmatics traditions. The present paper attempts to characterize a non-communicative form of language use, namely, informative language use. First, with the help of re-analyses of various example types previously analyzed from different perspectives in the pragmatics literature, the paper illustrates the real, independent existence of informative language use. Second, relying on these re-analyses of examples, and also applying a definition of ostensive-inferential communication, informative language use and communicative language use are distinguished. Third, the paper characterizes informative language use in detail and demonstrates what similarities and differences informative versus communicative forms of language use have. The conclusion of the research presented here is, on the one hand, that people's verbal behavior cannot be evaluated independently of their intentions, and, on the other hand, that utterances in a verbal interaction should be analyzed individually, and relying on the speakers' intentions that can be identified only by considering various linguistic and non-linguistic factors. For example, one and the same utterance can be treated as a manifestation of communicative language use toward an addressee and at the same time, as a manifestation of informative language use toward another person. It should also be emphasized that making a distinction between the informative and communicative forms of language use, first, has indisputable advantages in explaining the phenomena in language use, and second, results in a more comprehensive modeling of pragmatic competence
Cognitive psychology · Grice · Linguistics · Nonverbal communication · Ostensive definition · Pragmatics · Semantics (computer science · Spoken language · Utterance · Communication · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology
Pretense as deceptive behavioral communication
The ironist’s intentions
On understandings of intention
A relational account of communication on the basis of slips of the tongue
A socio-cognitive reinterpretation of Grice’s theory of conversation
Culture and incongruity in The Office (UK)
With or without intentions
Interaction between grammar and pragmatics
A burgeoning field of research
Mental models and humorous intent
| Citations per year | 0.63 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2010 - 2024 (15) |
| Highly cited | No |