Evaluating while justifying intercultural requests

Research into the speech-act request performed by people of different cultures operationalized at levels including nation, community of practice, and L2 speakers has identified and discussed sets of culture-related request-making behaviors. The findings of this research suggest that differences exist among cultures in request-making behaviors concerning the use and choice of request directness and strategies, rhetorical approaches, and internal and external modifications. The present study, with an intercultural orientation, focused on an external request modification element – grounder, an element that can function to build solidarity while justifying the request. The lexicogrammar used by both Chinese and non-Chinese professionals in textualizing the grounders accompanying their intercultural English requests made via email was analyzed using Appraisal Theory. The use of evaluative language in intercultural request grounders was then compared with that in intracultural ones. The findings indicate that while both Chinese and non-Chinese professionals demonstrated positive accommodative evaluative behavior in the construction of the discourse of intercultural request grounders, the non-Chinese professionals showed a stronger willingness to accommodate than the Chinese professionals. Possible reasons for the accommodation behavior demonstrated by the professionals of the two different cultures were offered and discussed

Accommodation · China · Chinese culture · Element (criminal law · Epistemology · Function (biology · Intercultural communication · Linguistics · Operationalization · Pedagogy · Political science · Rhetorical question · Solidarity · International Student and Expatriate Challenges · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Guarding the gate politically and politely

  Victor Ho•Journal of Politeness Research•2017

  Add to list