Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hierarchy politeness

What Brown and Levinson refused to see

Bibliographic Data

ID12859760
AuthorsAkio Yabuuchi (corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume3
Issue3
Publication date2006-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIntercultural Pragmatics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1612-295X • E-ISSN: 1613-365X
PublisherDe Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/ip.2006.019
OpenAlexW2034879500
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited31

Brown and Levinson's dichotomous (i.e., negative vs. positive) politeness system may be valid as a linguistic politeness system, but it is inadequate from a social psychological perspective, because it does not reflect sufficiently fundamental human desires. That is, it does not adequately treat the desire for admiration, which many believe to be a major force that has advanced human history. In fact, behaviors to gratify this desire have been endemic and have had the important function of maintaining societies. Brown and Levinson's underrating of this desire may be a reflection of the Western tradition of the pursuit of equality and sincerity. This paper, in an attempt to confer on the desire for admiration its proper place in polite behavior, presents a trichotomous politeness system that consists of autonomy, fellowship, and hierarchy politeness, and visualizes their positions and amounts within the framework of social distance and power. Toward the end of the paper, the implications of this model in collectivistic and individualistic societies are discussed

Hierarchy · Linguistics · Politeness · Politeness maxims · Politeness Theory · Political science · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Law · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Emotional Branding of China’s State-Owned Enterprises on Sina Weibo

    Open Access•Ying Hua•Journal of Critical Studies in…•2021

  • Failed humor

    Nicole Bell, Salvatore Attardo•Intercultural Pragmatics•2010

  • Potestas and the language of power

    Open Access•Kim Ridealgh, Luis Unceta Gómez•Journal of Pragmatics•2020

  • Sacred civility? An alternative conceptual architecture informed by cultural sociology

    M Horgan•Journal of Politeness Research•2020

  • Brown & Levinson's face

    Jim O’driscoll•Intercultural Pragmatics•2007

  • Linguistic politeness in social networks

    Open Access•Liping Tang•Synthese•2024

  • Politeness constructions in doctor-patient interactions in private hospitals in Akure, Nigeria

    David Olorunsogo•African Identities•2025

  • Emic conceptualisations of (im)politeness and face in Japanese

    Open Access•Michael Haugh•Journal of Pragmatics•2007

  • Politeness motivated by the 'heart' and 'binary rationality' in Thai culture

    Open Access•Songthama Intachakra•Journal of Pragmatics•2012

  • Intercultural communication

    Ronald Scollon, Suzanne B K Scollon et al.•Intercultural communication•1995

  • Gender and Politeness

    Open Access•Sara Mills•Gender and Politeness•2003

  • The Social Psychology of Groups

    John W Thibaut, John Thibaut et al.•Social Psychology of Groups•2017

  • Sex Differences and Apologies

    J Holmes•Applied Linguistics•1989

  • Outline of a Theory of Practice

    Open Access•Pierre Bourdieu, Richard Nice•On Violence•2007

  • Preface to Motivation Theory

    Abraham H Maslow•Psychosomatic Medicine•1943

  • Imperatives in requests

    Open Access•Song Mei Lee-Wong•Pragmatics Quarterly Publication…•2022

  • Politeness and conversational universals – observations from Japanese

    Y Matsumoto•Multilingua•1989

  • Relations of power and solidarity in scientific communities

    Dimitra Koutsantoni•Multilingua•2004

  • American and Japanese Business Discourse

    Don R Mccreary, Haru Yamada•Language•1994

  • Self-promotion is not ingratiating

    Debra K Godfrey, Edward E Jones et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Formal forms and discernment

    Sachiko Ide•Multilingua•1989

  • The association of deference with linguistic form

    Bruce Fraser, William Nolen et al.•International Journal of the…•1981

  • About face

    Open Access•Jim O’driscoll, Jim O''Driscoll et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•1996

  • Linguistic politeness

    Open Access•G Kasper•Journal of Pragmatics•1990

  • Indirectness and politeness in requests

    Open Access•Shoshana Blum‐kulka, Shoshana Blum-Kulka•Journal of Pragmatics•1987

  • Re-examining linguistic power

    Open Access•Shoji Takano•Journal of Pragmatics•2005

  • Universals of linguistic politeness

    Open Access•Beverly Hill, Sachiko Ide et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•1986

  • Social distance and speech behavior

    Open Access•Diana Boxer•Journal of Pragmatics•1993

  • Face' and polite verbal behaviors in Chinese culture

    Open Access•Shaojun Ji•Journal of Pragmatics•2000

  • Perspectives on politeness

    Open Access•Bruce Fraser•Journal of Pragmatics•1990

  • Reexamination of the universality of face

    Open Access•Y Matsumoto•Journal of Pragmatics•1988

  • Apologies in New Zealand English

    Open Access•J Holmes•Language in Society•1990

  • Unequal Relationships in High and Low Power Distance Societies

    Open Access•Helen Spencer-Oatey•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•1997

  • Intercultural Encounters

    Open Access•Dean C Barnlund, Shoko Araki•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•1985

  • On the Concept of Face

    D Y F Ho, David Yau-Fai Ho•American Journal of Sociology•1976

Citations per year0.47
Citation span2007 - 2025 (19)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae