Disagreement and mitigation in power-asymmetrical venture capital reality TV shows
A comparative case study of Shark Tank in the US and Dragon’s Den in China
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 12859872 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Huiyu Zhang (0000-0002-1354-1581, Zhejiang University), Zhao Jun-xiang (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Yicheng Wu (0000-0003-2284-0417, Zhejiang University, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 18 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 245-276 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-03-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Intercultural Pragmatics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1612-295X • E-ISSN: 1613-365X |
| Editorial | De Gruyter (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ip-2021-2004 |
| OpenAlex | W3135914956 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 59 |
This paper examines the relationships among cultural variation, power, disagreement, and mitigation devices. Based on a multi-modal analysis of original data from two TV shows ( Shark Tank in the US and Dragon’s Den in China), it is found that investors’ linguistic performance shows greater frequency and variation in both disagreement and its mitigation, influenced by power and politeness. Regarding the role of cultural variation, this study challenges some stereotypical conceptions of culture with the finding that Chinese participants use negation more often than their US counterparts. Meanwhile, Chinese and American participants choose different disagreement-mitigation formats: In the US Shark Tank investors tend to initiate disagreements by enforcing explicitness and entrepreneurs tend to mitigate them by offering explanations, while in the Chinese Dragon’s Den investors tend to utter negations and then mitigate them with qualifiers or alternative statements. Moreover, the American show also contains cases where the pre-set power-asymmetrical relationship changes during the course of presentation, and entrepreneurs with increasing power start to challenge investors by asking them various questions. However, this alteration of power relationships appears to be more difficult in the Chinese context
Business · Capital (architecture · China · Context (archaeology · Linguistics · Negation · Politeness · Political science · Power (physics · Set (abstract data type · Variation (astronomy · Computer Science · History · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Law · Multilingual Education and Policy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Marketing
Intercultural communication
Gesture and Thought
Gender and Politeness
Impoliteness
Politeness Phenomena in England And Greece
The Pronouns of Power and Solidarity
Interaction Ritual
Expressing Disagreement in ELF Business Negotiations
Power and Politeness in Action
Laughing when nothing’s funny
Transcription design principles for spoken discourse research
You Have No Idea What You are Talking About!” From e-disagreement to e-impoliteness in two online fora
Politeness and in-directness across cultures
Expressing disagreement in English as a lingua franca
American and Chinese complaints
Internal e-mail communication in the workplace
A cross-linguistic study of metacommunication in online hotel reviews
Politeness in power-asymmetrical e-mail requests of Korean and American corporate employees
The conflict‐positive organization
Relative status and interpersonal presumptuousness
Culture and concepts of power
Language structure in social interaction
Politeness
Beyond the micro-level in politeness research
Theorising disagreement
Conversational mitigation
Disagreement patterns in gifted classes
Desirable and undesirable disagreements
Managing relationships in everyday practice
Power, severity, and context in disagreement
Disagreeing without a 'no
Chinese requests
Universals of linguistic politeness
Managing disagreement in problem solving meeting talk
Arguing about the future
Different cultures, different languages, different speech acts
Indirectness and politeness in Turkish-German bilingual and Turkish monolingual requests
Strategic embarrassment and face threatening in business interactions
Honorifics, "politeness," and power in Japanese political debate
Disagreements, face and politeness
Against rationalistic pragmatics
Reexamination of the universality of face
Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese
Agonism in academic discourse
Jewish argument as sociability
Yes, but
Unequal Relationships in High and Low Power Distance Societies
The Dynamics of Face Loss Following Interpersonal Harm for Chinese and Americans
Social-Cognitive and Situational Influences on the Use of Face-Saving Persuasive Strategies
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |