Forensic Linguistics
An Overview of the Intersection and Interaction of Language and Law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12866110 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maite Correa (0000-0002-9970-5654, Colorado State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 0 |
| Issue | 23 |
| Publication date | 2013-12-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies About Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1648-2824 • E-ISSN: 2029-7203 |
| Publisher | Kaunas University of Technology (KTU) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5755/j01.sal.0.23.5020 |
| OpenAlex | W2065952803 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 14 |
Forensic Linguistics (FL) is a relatively new subfield within applied linguistics that studies the different intersections between language and the legal field, which is heavily linguistic by nature. In order to have a fair, legal and effective procedure, anyone involved in a legal process (lawyers, judges, police officers, members of a jury, etc.) benefits from possessing a certain awareness of linguistic principles. With this purpose, the expert testimony of a linguist could contribute to the understanding or recognition of possible interpretations or points of view that might have gone otherwise unnoticed. This article provides the general linguist with an overview of the broad field of FL and highlights the different ways the discipline can contribute to the criminal justice system. It presents a summary of some of the most well-known and discussed legal cases and outlines the intersections between applied linguistics (mainly pragmatics, discourse analysis, and sociolinguistics) and this emerging field in three interrelated areas: (1) language as the medium of communication between law enforcement authorities and suspects/witnesses or as the medium of legal argumentation in the courtroom, (2) language of the law (issues of intelligibility, interpretation and construction of legal language), and (3) crimes of language and linguistic evidence (use, validity, and reliability in the courtroom). Challenges and limitations of the field are also discussed. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5755/j01.sal.0.23.5020
Applied linguistics · Argumentation theory · Comparative law · Epistemology · Intelligibility (philosophy · Legal psychology · Linguistics · Philosophy of law · Political science · Pragmatics · Quantitative linguistics · Sociocultural linguistics · Sociolinguistics · Sociology · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law · Philosophy · Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Application Statement Analysis Conversation of the Murder Case at the Makassar District Court (Forensic Linguistics)
Analisis Wacana Kritis Keputusan Bersama Tentang Pedoman Implementasi Atas Pasal Tertentu Dalam Undang-Undang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik (Uu Ite) (Critical Discourse Analysis of Joint Decisions on Implementation Guidelines on Certain Articles in the Law on Electronic Information and Transaction) (Ite Law)
Hedging in Forensic Discourse
Police Written Discourse
Forensic linguistics
The bilingual courtroom
How faithfully do court interpreters render the style of non-English speaking witnesses' testimonies? A data-based study of Spanish—English bilingual proceedings
Mapping applied linguistics
Threatening Revisited
Ten unanswered language questions about Miranda
Empirical evaluations of language-based author identification techniques
Readers’ comprehension of temporary restraining orders in domestic violence cases
Linguistic experts as semantic tour guides
Can linguists help judges know what they mean? Linguistic semantics in the court-room
Evaluating Jury Comprehension of Illinois Capital-Sentencing Instructions
Double jeopardy in the interrogation room for youths with mental illness
The Bilingual Courtroom
Questions as a mode of control in magistrates' courts
Legal interpreters
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |