Language and Knowledge in the Modern Society
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12866249 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Marie-Louise Sandén (Linköping University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2002 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 60-62 |
| Publication date | 2002-11-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies About Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1648-2824 • E-ISSN: 2029-7203 |
| Publisher | Kaunas University of Technology (KTU) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5755/j01.sal.1.3.43162 |
| OpenAlex | W2186861129 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 6 |
Language is not only our most important means for presenting ideas, values, and norms. It also shapes the way individuals view the world. Knowledge as a concept is positively loaded. Politicians are talking of the importance of knowledge and an idea that knowledge puts things into motion. In the industrial society most people were occupied in manipulating things compared to in the post-industrial society where people instead are manipulating meanings. In the changing society of today scientists are describing a shift from redistribution to recognition. Mass media are then important in selecting, associating, manipulating, and diffusing symbols. Those with sound language capacity have an advantage in ‘world making’ and also in formulating clichés that might manipulate people’s mind and destroy what Habermas calls ‘emancipatory’ knowledge. Then it might be of importance to analyse linguistic clichés – also inside social science – and ask who are the persons having the language capacity to define the world we are living in
Epistemology · Industrial society · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Redistribution (election · Sociology · Anthropology · Information Society and Technology Trends · Law · Media, Communication, and Education · Philosophy · Whitehead's Philosophy and Applications
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |