Santi Romano against the state
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12866786 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lars Vinx (0000-0003-0973-9613, University of Cambridge, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 25-36 |
| Publication date | 2018-07-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethics & Global Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1654-6369 • E-ISSN: 1654-4951 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/16544951.2018.1498697 |
| OpenAlex | W2883560415 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 8 |
This paper argues that Santi Romano’s legal institutionalism is driven by implicit normative assumptions that stand in tension with Romano’s commitments to legal positivism and legal pluralism. Romano’s approach to the individuation of legal orders is indefensible on purely descriptive grounds, as it rests on a picture of good social order. That picture, in turn, gives more prominence to the state, as an institution of institutions, than one would expect in a thoroughly pluralist legal theory. Romano’s reflections on the different ways in which institutions can become legally relevant to one another is nevertheless highly valuable. It provides the toolkit for developing a normatively attractive conception of the legal relations of the state to other institutional orders
Economics · Epistemology · Individuation · Institution · Institutionalism · Law and economics · Legal pluralism · Legal positivism · Legal realism · Legal research · Normative · Order (exchange · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Positivism · Social order · Sociology · State (computer science · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2021 (3) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |