Revising Sangiovanni's reciprocity-based internationalism

To whom do we owe obligations of socio-economic justice? How are such obligations generated? Internationalism denotes a range of approaches to these questions. This paper examines Andrea Sangiovanni's—an internationalist—response to these questions. Sangiovanni argues that we owe egalitarian obligations only to those in the state, and that egalitarian obligations are generated through relationships of ‘reciprocity’. His is a ‘reciprocity-based internationalism’ (RBI). RBI has two components—one normative and another empirical. In this paper, I will assume the normative component, but reject its empirical component. My rejection of the empirical component has normative implications for RBI, which generate egalitarian obligations beyond the state. In other words, my revision of RBI is an argument in favour of international egalitarian obligations not generated through cosmopolitanism, but through internationalism

Cosmopolitanism · Economics · Empirical research · Epistemology · Internationalism (politics · Law and economics · Normative · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Reciprocity (cultural anthropology · Social science · Sociology · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics