Indignation, practical rationality and our moral life

This paper offers a grammatical investigation of some important aspects of our moral life taking a scene from the movie Mr. Deeds Goes to Town as a test case. The main question I try to answer is whether there are situations in our moral discussions in which the proper and rational attitude is to show disagreement(e.g. by expressing indignation), as opposed to continuing the dialogue. Many philosophers seem committed to a conception of moral reasoning that takes as its end rational agreement among agents; from that perspective, expressing indignation would just amount to an irrational way of trying to get rid of the burdens put upon the agent's shoulders in the context of a moral discussion. Against that widespread viewIwill defend a Cavellian version of moral perfectionism, which takes rational disagreement as a legitimate (and even productive) outcomeof moral arguments. That view, as we shall see, will be predicated upon a distinctive understanding of practical rationality, hence the importance of comparing moral discussion to other forms of rational engagement (e.g., aesthetic, scientific and mathematical)

Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Indignation · Irrational number · Irrationality · Moral disengagement · Moral psychology · Moral reasoning · Political science · Rationality · Social cognitive theory of morality · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

• Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome: The Constitution of Emersonian Perfectionism

  Stanley Cavell•Conditions Handsome and Unhandsome•1991

  Incluir item

• Critique of Judgment

  Immanuel Kant•Art and Its Significance•1994

  Incluir item

• Must We Mean What We Say?

  Open Access•Stanley Cavell•Must We Mean What We Say?•2002

  Incluir item

• Nietzsche's Perfectionism

  Open Access•James Conant•Nietzsche's Postmoralism•2000

  Incluir item

• Stanley Cavell

  Russell B Goodman, Stephen Mulhall•The Philosophical Quarterly•1996

  Incluir item

• The claim of reason

  Stanley Cavell•The claim of reason•1999

  Incluir item