Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fair national election studies

How well are we doing

Bibliographic Data

ID12869647
AuthorsChristina Eder (0000-0002-7703-4108, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, corresponding author), Alexander Jedinger (0000-0003-3511-0368, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences)
Year2018
Volume18
Issue4
Pages651-668
Publication date2018-11-12
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1680-4333 • E-ISSN: 1682-0983
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/s41304-018-0194-3
OpenAlexW2901141439
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited9

Election studies are an important data pillar in political and social science, as most political research investigations involve secondary use of existing datasets. Researchers depend on high-quality data because data quality determines the accuracy of the conclusions drawn from statistical analyses. We outline data reuse quality criteria pertaining to data accessibility, metadata provision, and data documentation using the FAIR Principles of research data management as a framework (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability). We then investigate the extent to which a selection of election studies fulfils these criteria using studies from Western democracies. Our results reveal that although most election studies are easily accessible and well documented and that the overall level of data processing is satisfactory, some important deficits remain. Further analyses of technical documentation indicate that while a majority of election studies provide the necessary documents, there is still room for improvement

Business · Comparative politics · Data management · Data quality · Data science · Database · Documentation · Interoperability · Metadata · Political science · Politics · Quality (philosophy · Reuse · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Data Quality and Management · Engineering · Law · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Research Data Management Practices

  • Between urgency and data quality

    Open Access•Veronika Batzdorfer, Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen et al.•Research Ethics•2024

  • The three pillars approach and a practicum portfolio for Fair research in political science

    Open Access•Natalie Meyers•European Political Science•2025

  • Building a Fair, linked, and open data ecosystem

    Open Access•Thomas Mustillo•European Political Science•2025

  • Handbook of Survey Research

    James D Wright, Peter Henry Rossi•Handbook of survey research•1983

  • The Fair Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship

    Open Access•Mark D Wilkinson, Michel Dumontier et al.•Scientific Data•2016

  • Reference Rot

    Open Access•Aaron L Gertler, John G Bullock•PS Political Science & Politics•2017

  • Data Accessibility in Political Science

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Katherine Tate•PS Political Science & Politics•1995

  • Openness in Political Science

    Open Access•Arthur Lupia, Colin Elman•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • Making DA-RT a Reality

    Open Access•Thomas M Carsey•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

Citations per year1.5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae