Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Negative Results in Social Science

Bibliographic Data

ID12869740
AuthorsDavid Lehrer (0000-0002-7589-9896, University of Helsinki, corresponding author), Janine Leschke (0000-0003-0946-8550, European Trade Union Institute), Stefan K Lhachimi (0000-0001-8597-0935, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research), Ana Vasiliu, Brigitte Weiffen (0000-0003-0341-8704, University of Tübingen)
Year2007
Volume6
Issue1
Pages51-68
Publication date2007-02-21
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1680-4333 • E-ISSN: 1682-0983
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210114
OpenAlexW1970730462
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited23

Do academic publication standards reflect or determine research results? The article proposes minimal criteria for distinguishing useful ‘unpublishable’ results from low-quality research, and argues that the virtues of negative results have been overlooked. We consider the fate these results have suffered thus far, review arguments for and against their publication and introduce a new initiative – a journal to disseminate negative results and advance debate on their recognition and use

Comparative politics · Economics · Epistemology · International relations · Law and economics · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Data Analysis and Archiving · Law · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Philosophy · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Soziologie in Österreich – Internationale Verflechtungen

    Open Access•Helmut Staubmann•Soziologie in Österreich -…•2016

  • When Is a Service an Essential Public Service

    Open Access•Steven Van De Walle•Annals of Public and Cooperative…•2009

  • Desperately Seeking Regulatory Impact Assessments

    Open Access•Claudio M Radaelli•Evaluation•2009

  • The man who never was? The Italian transition and 2008 election

    James L Newell•Journal of Modern Italian Studies•2009

  • Validating Peer Review in Criminal Justice Evaluation Research

    John Worrall, John L Worrall•Journal of Criminal Justice…•2015

  • The Territorial Dimension of Ministerial Selection in Spain

    Jean-Baptiste Harguindéguy, Cristina Fernández Rivera et al.•Ethnopolitics•2022

  • Political Science in its European and Global Context

    Open Access•Martin J Bull, James L Newell•European Political Science•2008

  • From Methodology to Practice

    Open Access•Sean Yom•Comparative Political Studies•2015

  • Explaining the Intensity of the Arab Spring

    Open Access•Chonghyun Christie Byun, Ethan J Hollander•Digest of Middle East Studies•2015

  • The social organization of sexuality

    Edward O Laumann, John H Gagnon•The social organization of…•1994

  • Biases in the Interpretation and Use of Research Results

    Robert J Maccoun•Annual Review of Psychology•1998

  • Publication prejudices

    Open Access•Michael J Mahoney•Cognitive Therapy and Research•1977

  • The Difference Between “Significant” and “Not Significant” is not Itself Statistically Significant

    Andrew Gelman, Hal Stern et al.•The American Statistician•2006

  • Nuisance vs. Substance

    Open Access•Niels Beck, Nathaniel Beck et al.•Political Analysis•1996

  • New Light on Old Boys

    Open Access•G D L Travis, H M Collins•Science Technology & Human Values•1991

  • Scientific Inference and the Pursuit of Fame

    Open Access•Jesús Pedro Zamora Bonilla•Philosophy of Science•2002

  • Asking Sensitive Questions

    Roger Tourangeau, Tom W Smith et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1996

  • The Dangers of Extreme Counterfactuals

    Open Access•Gary King, Langche Zeng•Political Analysis•2006

  • Testing for Publication Bias in Political Science

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Donald P Green et al.•Political Analysis•2001

  • Publication Bias Reconsidered

    Open Access•Lee Sigelman•Political Analysis•1999

  • How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization‐welfare state nexus revisited

    Open Access•B Kittel, Hannes Winner•European Journal of Political…•2005

  • Specification Uncertainty and Model Averaging

    Larry M Bartels•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • What To Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data

    Open Access•Niels Beck, Nathaniel Beck et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • Data Collection Mode and Social Desirability Bias in Self-Reported Religious Attendance

    Stanley Presser, Linda Stinson et al.•American Sociological Review•1998

  • How Are the Mighty Fallen

    Open Access•Joshua S Gans, George B Shepherd•The Journal of Economic…•1994

  • Measurement Validity

    Open Access•Robert Adcock, Donald Collier et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Towards a Pragmatist-Inspired Philosophy of Social Science

    Open Access•Patrick Baert•Acta Sociologica•2005

Unique citing works9
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2008 - 2022 (15)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae