Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Was the Brexit referendum legitimate, and would a second one be so

Bibliographic Data

ID12869768
AuthorsR Bellamy (0000-0002-9823-0626, Centre Max Weber, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume18
Issue1
Pages126-133
Publication date2018-03-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1680-4333 • E-ISSN: 1682-0983
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/s41304-018-0155-x
OpenAlexW2789377502
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited9

This article suggests that common arguments questioning the legitimacy of the first Brexit referendum prove flawed, as do certain others supporting the legitimacy of a second referendum. A different case for a second referendum is offered that would have added to the legitimacy of the first, but the opportunity for which has now passed. Nevertheless, it might be legitimate to overturn the first referendum through a normal parliamentary process should there be a significant level of Bremorse among the public, or a general election supporting a change of policy

Brexit · Comparative politics · Democratic legitimacy · Economics · European union · International economics · Legitimacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Referendum · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • Technopopulism

    Christopher J Bickerton, Carlo Invernizzi Accetti•Technopopulism•2021

  • What Is a Consultative Referendum? The Democratic Legitimacy of Popular Consultations

    Open Access•Carlo Invernizzi Accetti, Giulia Oskian•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • How a lack of truthfulness can undermine democratic representation

    Open Access•Sten Hansson, Sandra Kröger•The British Journal of Politics…•2020

  • Resilience and adaptation of the UK’s arts sector during the process of the UK’s withdrawal from the EU

    Charlotte Faucher•International Journal of Cultural…•2022

  • Political Constitutionalism and Referendums

    Open Access•R Bellamy•Social & Legal Studies•2023

  • Brextinction? How cohort replacement has transformed support for Brexit

    Open Access•Joris Frese, J Harkonen et al.•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • EU referendums in context

    Open Access•Eva G Heidbreder, I Stadelmann-Steffen et al.•Public Administration•2018

  • The Paradox of Brexit and the Consequences of Taking Back Control

    Open Access•Paul Agu Igwe•Societies•2022

  • Negotiating secession

    Open Access•Benjamin Martill•British Politics•2022

  • Can Disintegration Be Democratic? The European Union Between Legitimate Change and Regression

    Open Access•Markus Patberg•Political Studies•2020

  • The 2019 European Parliament election in the UK

    Open Access•Benjamin Martill•Italian Political Science…•2020

  • Making Referendums Safe for Democracy

    Open Access•Sherrie Chamber, Simone Chamber•Swiss Political Science Review•2018

  • Designing Popular Vote Processes to Enhance Democratic Systems

    Open Access•Alice El‐wakil, Alice El-Wakil et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2018

  • The Democratic Ambivalence of EU Disintegration

    Open Access•Markus Patberg•Swiss Political Science Review•2021

  • Counting the Many

    Open Access•Melissa Schwartzberg•Counting the Many•2013

  • Brexit

    Open Access•Harold D Clarke, Matthew Goodwin et al.•Brexit•2017

  • Constitutional Referendums

    Stephen Tierney•Constitutional referendums•2012

  • Political Legitimacy and Democracy

    Allen Buchanan•Ethics•2002

  • A Set of Independent Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Simple Majority Decision

    Kenneth O May•Econometrica•1952

  • The Disfranchisement of the Elderly, and Other Attempts to Secure Intergenerational Justice

    Open Access•Philippe Van Parijs•Philosophy & Public Affairs•1998

  • Morphing the Demos into the right shape. Normative principles for enfranchising resident aliens and expatriate citizens

    Rainer Bauböck•Democratization•2015

Unique citing works14
Citations per year1,75
Citation span2018 - 2024 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae