Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Go ask Alisoun

Geoffrey Chaucer and Deafland (deafness as authority)

Bibliographic Data

ID12879745
AuthorsCarol Robinson (0000-0003-3033-4565, Kent State University, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume15
Issue6
Publication date2018-05-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLiterature Compass (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1741-4113 • E-ISSN: 1741-4113
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lic3.12454
OpenAlexW2802035452
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited5

I would like to ask that scholars of medieval studies consider several factors in examining the relationship(s) between deafness, Deafland , and Geoffrey Chaucer—really consider what it means to be hearing disabled , to be deaf . The barrier between Chaucer scholars and the deaf is actually as simple as unawareness . This barrier might be understood in two ways: (1) as a wall between Chaucerians (both scholars and students) and Geoffrey Chaucer's text or (2) as a lack of full perspective, of complete comprehension, of that wall: its depth, its height, its volume, its density, and so forth. In other words, this barrier represents a difference in dimensions, as well as a difference between a priori appreciation and experiential understanding of the senses. To voice is not a measure of either vocalness or muteness of sounds. It is not a measure of one's ability or inability to speak. Voice is not measured in terms of sound at all. It is a measure of how fluent one is: is that individual fluent in a spoken language, fluent in a written language, fluent in a signed language? (Remember, in the Middle Ages, it was rather common for one to be fluent in one spoken language, such as Old Irish, and fluent in a specialized language, such as Latin—something not at all unfamiliar to those who are fluent in American Sign Language and written English today.) Chaucer's Wife of Bath's characterization makes for an interesting tie to members of Deafland (both those who do and do not sign) and to the uniqueness of visual–spatial perspectives contained within a predominately temporal–audio world, which has always given priority and privilege of sounded voice over signed voice (if the latter was permitted to exist at all). In the case of this complex character, this Wife of Bath, the likelihood of misunderstanding who she is, and what Chaucer intends us to see in her, is high. Alisoun seems to be a magic deaf person—in even some of the most unlikely of situations, such as from one end of a long line of pilgrims on horse—but actually, she is not . There is nothing magical about deafness, just as there is nothing magical about audism and other forms of discrimination. Abstract in ASL (online): https://globalchaucers.wordpress.com/recordings

American Sign Language · Comprehension · Linguistics · Sign language · Spoken language · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Deafness and Nonspeaking in Late Medieval Iceland (1200–1550)

    Yoav Tirosh•Viator•2020

  • A thousand plateaus

    Félix Guattari, Gilles Deleuze•A thousand plateaus•1987

  • Disability in the Middle Ages

    Chandri Raghava Reddy•Journal of Intercultural Studies•2013

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae