Knowledge-How, Ability, and Linguistic Variance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12881693 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Masaharu Mizumoto (0000-0002-3138-9288, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 492-514 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | EPISTÉMÈ (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1976-9660 • E-ISSN: 1750-0117 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/epi.2024.9 |
| OpenAlex | W4393147830 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
In this paper, we present results of cross-linguistic studies of Japanese and English knowing how constructions that show radical differences in knowledge-how attributions with large effect sizes. The results suggest that the relevant ability is neither necessary nor sufficient for knowledge-how captured by Japanese constructions. We shall argue that such data will open up a gap between otherwise indistinguishable two conceptions of the very topic of knowledge-how, or the debate between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism, namely a debate about the nature of knowledge-how and a debate about the state captured by “know how”, which we call the knowledge-how interpretation and the state interpretation, respectively. Consequently, the results have not only various possible philosophical implications that have not been considered or discussed in the literature but also provide new topics in the theory of knowledge-how, including the question of which interpretation of the topic is correct itself
Business · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Variance (accounting · Computer Science · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Epistemology for the Rest of the World
Know How
Knowing How
Against intellectualism
I.—Knowing How and Knowing that
Difference and Robustness in the Patterns of Philosophical Intuition Across Demographic Groups
Demographic Differences in Philosophical Intuition
Linguistic Solutions to Philosophical Problems
Embodied savoir-faire
Evidence for anti-intellectualism about know-how from a sentence recognition task
The linguistic argument for intellectualism
KNOWING HOW as a philosophical hybrid
Two Methodologies for Evaluating Intellectualism
Why Intellectualism Still Fails
Knowing-How and Knowing-That
| Highly cited | No |
|---|