Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Knowledge-How, Ability, and Linguistic Variance

Bibliographic Data

ID12881693
AuthorsMasaharu Mizumoto (0000-0002-3138-9288, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume22
Issue2
Pages492-514
Publication date2024-03-25
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEPISTÉMÈ (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1976-9660 • E-ISSN: 1750-0117
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/epi.2024.9
OpenAlexW4393147830
LanguageEN
References cited34

In this paper, we present results of cross-linguistic studies of Japanese and English knowing how constructions that show radical differences in knowledge-how attributions with large effect sizes. The results suggest that the relevant ability is neither necessary nor sufficient for knowledge-how captured by Japanese constructions. We shall argue that such data will open up a gap between otherwise indistinguishable two conceptions of the very topic of knowledge-how, or the debate between intellectualism and anti-intellectualism, namely a debate about the nature of knowledge-how and a debate about the state captured by “know how”, which we call the knowledge-how interpretation and the state interpretation, respectively. Consequently, the results have not only various possible philosophical implications that have not been considered or discussed in the literature but also provide new topics in the theory of knowledge-how, including the question of which interpretation of the topic is correct itself

Business · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Variance (accounting · Computer Science · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Epistemology for the Rest of the World

    Stephen Stich, Masaharu Mizumoto et al.•Epistemology for the Rest of the…•2018

  • Know How

    Jason Stanley•Know how•2011

  • Knowing How

    Jason Stanley, Timothy Willlamson et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2001

  • Against intellectualism

    Alva Noë•Analysis•2005

  • I.—Knowing How and Knowing that

    Gilbert Ryle•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•1946

  • Difference and Robustness in the Patterns of Philosophical Intuition Across Demographic Groups

    Open Access•Joshua Knobe•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2023

  • Demographic Differences in Philosophical Intuition

    Open Access•Stephen P Stich, Edouard Machery•Review of Philosophy and Psychology•2023

  • Linguistic Solutions to Philosophical Problems

    Open Access•Barbara Abbott•Philosophical Perspectives•2013

  • Embodied savoir-faire

    Open Access•N Levy•Synthese•2017

  • Evidence for anti-intellectualism about know-how from a sentence recognition task

    Open Access•Ian Harmon, Zachary Horne•Synthese•2016

  • The linguistic argument for intellectualism

    Open Access•Christos Douskos•Synthese•2013

  • KNOWING HOW as a philosophical hybrid

    Open Access•Chad Gonnerman, Kaija Mortensen et al.•Synthese•2021

  • Two Methodologies for Evaluating Intellectualism

    Open Access•Ephraim Glick•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2011

  • Why Intellectualism Still Fails

    Andreas Ditter•The Philosophical Quarterly•2016

  • Knowing-How and Knowing-That

    Open Access•Jeremy Fantl•Philosophy Compass•2008

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae