Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Race for Hafiz

Scholarly and Popular Translations at the Fin de Siècle

Bibliographic Data

ID12888276
AuthorsAlexander Bubb (0000-0002-4345-2774, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume17
Issue2
Pages225-244
Publication date2020-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueComparative Critical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-1854 • E-ISSN: 1750-0109
PublisherEdinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3366/ccs.2020.0360
OpenAlexW3065377174
LanguageEN
Citations received1

The great Persian lyric poet Hafiz was first translated into English by Sir William Jones in the 1780s. In the course of the nineteenth century many further translations would appear, initially intended for the use of oriental scholars and students of the Persian language, but increasingly also for the general reading public. The paraphrasers or ‘popularizers’ who devised the latter category of translation competed with professional scholars to shape the dissemination and popular perception of Persian poetry. Owing to a variety of factors, the middle of the nineteenth century saw a marked decline in the number of new Hafiz translations, and it is not until 1891 that a complete edition of Hafiz's works finally appeared in English. This led to an unusual situation, particular to Britain, in which scholars (Edward H. Palmer, Henry Wilberforce-Clarke, Gertrude Bell), and popularizers (Richard Burton, Herman Bicknell, Justin McCarthy, Richard Le Gallienne, John Payne) all jostled to fill the vacuum created by the absence of a definitive version. Their competition created, in short order, a diversity of versions presented to consumers, which allowed Hafiz's influence to be felt in twentieth-century poetry untrammelled by the impress (as became the case with Omar Khayyam) of one dominant translator. While the refraction of Hafiz through the biases and predispositions of multiple translators has been regarded as hopelessly distorting by Julie Scott Meisami, I argue instead that it highlights lyric, in the richness and diversity characteristic of Hafiz, as the Persian poetic mode which has been more influential on English writing and yet the most difficult to categorize and integrate. Lastly, by paying heed to the popular transmission of Hafiz in English, we might better understand the reception of Persian poetry in its generic, rather than only its formal character

Art · Diversity (politics · Fin de siecle · Linguistics · Literature · Order (exchange · Persian · Poetry · Reading (process · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Anthropology · History · Philosophy · Translation Studies and Practices

  • Surveilling the Poetic Body

    Sara Hakeem Grewal, Sara Grewal•differences•2025

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae