The Allure of Synthesis
Science and the Literary in Comparative and World Literature
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12888396 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alessio Mattana (0000-0001-7416-2844, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 351-372 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Critical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-1854 • E-ISSN: 1750-0109 |
| Publisher | Edinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3366/ccs.2020.0369 |
| OpenAlex | W3092938187 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
This article offers a reconstruction of the scientific lineage of comparative and world literature. It will be argued that the approaches by Philarète Chasles and Johann Wolfgang von Goethe were influenced by the meaning of ‘comparative’ developed in scientific texts in the long eighteenth century. Building on the assumption that literature may be made into a hard science, a number of nineteenth-century comparatists then sought to elaborate syntheses of literature in the form of universal laws that would hold to all literary texts. I argue that this ‘scientifying’ approach to literature is still at work to this day, and I conclude my intervention by pointing to the epistemological issues that must be considered when the literary is treated scientifically
Art · Comparative literature · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literary criticism · Literary science · Literature · Meaning (existential · Scientific literature · Sociology · World literature · Classical Studies and Philology · History · Philosophy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|