Exploring the involvement and perceptions of professional stakeholders on Nice clinical guidelines
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12888985 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Irene Ilott (0000-0003-0315-6572, University of Sheffield, corresponding author), Judy Mead (Chartered Society of Physiotherapy), Julia Roberts (Royal College of Occupational Therapists), Ralph Hammond (0000-0003-0296-1633, Chartered Society of Physiotherapy), Henny Pearmain (Royal College of Occupational Therapists) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 333-356 |
| Publication date | 2006-08-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Evidence & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-2648 • E-ISSN: 1744-2656 |
| Publisher | Policy Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1332/174426406778023711 |
| OpenAlex | W1967447734 |
| Language | EN |
English This article gives an insight into the effectiveness of stakeholding from the perspective of 15 professional bodies for the allied health professions, health visiting, health scientists, midwifery and nursing in the development of National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical guidelines. The findings reveal that larger professional bodies had embedded stakeholder relations within business plans while smaller organisations, with minimal infrastructure and reliant on voluntary activity, had difficulty participating. Stakeholding highlighted the challenge for research-emergent professions of making their evidence count within guideline methodology. The recommendations about understanding the purpose and problems of stakeholding are likely to be transferable to other contexts
Engineering ethics · Excellence · Guideline · Health care · Health professionals · Nice · Perception · Political science · Professional association · Public relations · Stakeholder · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Engineering · Health Policy Implementation Science · Medicine · Nursing · Primary Care and Health Outcomes · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|