When evidence alone is not enough
The problem, policy and politics of water fluoridation in England
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12889139 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gary Lowery (0000-0003-1864-902X, University of Sheffield, corresponding author), Matthew Flinders (0000-0003-3585-9010, University of Sheffield), Barry J Gibson (0000-0003-1413-4950, University of Sheffield) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 507-523 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-22 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Evidence & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-2648 • E-ISSN: 1744-2656 |
| Publisher | Policy Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1332/174426420x16079614941921 |
| OpenAlex | W3122332877 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 22 |
Background: Tooth extractions are the most common cause of hospital admissions for children in England. Water fluoridation has the potential to reduce this number by 60%, is backed by the scientific and public health communities, and yet is currently consumed by only 10% of the population. Aims and objectives: This ‘evidence-policy gap’ is explored through Kingdon’s ‘multi-streams approach’ which provides insights into the circumstances under which water fluoridation has made it onto the political agenda, the rationale underpinning opponent and advocate policy positions, and the role of the political arena in fostering or hindering policy action. Methods: Over 100 primary documents were reviewed to develop an understanding of the scientific and ethical arguments for and against water fluoridation, as well as to identify how they have all historically sought to mobilise their policy preferences. Eleven consultations were also conducted with stakeholders as part of the knowledge exchange process. Findings: The key finding of this research is that evidence is only likely to trigger policy change if it emerges into a receptive sociopolitical context. In substantiating this claim we identify evidence not of an ‘evidence-policy gap’ but of a more complex and multidimensional ‘evidence-policy-politics gap’. Discussion and conclusions: The findings contribute to a range of debates in relation to: (1) the apparent irreconcilability of background ideas about what ought to form the basis of public health policymaking; (2) the presence of differing evidential standards that create an uneven playing field; and (3) the central underpinning role of politics in public health policymaking
Alternative medicine · Context (archaeology · Evidence-based policy · Geography · Grey literature · MEDLINE · Political science · Politics · Public health · Public policy · Public relations · Scientific evidence · Underpinning · Water fluoridation · Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes · Health disparities and outcomes · Healthcare Systems and Challenges · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Health Policy
Hierarchy of evidence
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
An exploration of the theoretical concepts policy windows and policy entrepreneurs at the Swedish public health arena
Slaying sacred cows
Why feelings trump facts
Into Every Home, Into Every Body
A River Runs Through It
Water fluoridation and hypothyroidism
Are fluoride levels in drinking water associated with hypothyroidism prevalence in England? A large observational study of GP practice data and fluoride levels in drinking water
Public Health Professionals as Policy Entrepreneurs
Post-truth politics and the social sciences
Participation in Policy Streams
The not-so-hidden politics of fluoridation
When Politics Fails
The Risk Game and the Blame Game
Theoretically refining the multiple streams framework
Economic Inequality and Democratic Political Engagement
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |