Evidence and policy networks
The UK debate about sex offender community notification
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12889359 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tobias Jung (0000-0002-9371-404X, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author), Sandra Nutley (University of Edinburgh) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 187-207 |
| Publication date | 2008-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Evidence & Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-2648 • E-ISSN: 1744-2656 |
| Publisher | Policy Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1332/174426408784614644 |
| OpenAlex | W2051338995 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
This article explores the role and use of evidence by actors involved in the policy debate on sex offender community notification in the summer of 2000. It examines what was considered as evidence, how it was used and by which actors. It highlights the wide and fluid nature of evidence and the rapidity with which it can infuse policy debates. Although evidence was used strategically and tactically by most actors, the policy debate was well informed. Overall, the relationship between evidence and policy that emerges is a far cry from the ‘two communities’ view of evidence providers and evidence users
Alternative medicine · Criminology · Evidence-based policy · Evidence-based practice · Political science · Public relations · Rules of evidence · Sex offender · Sociology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Medicine · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2015 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |