Fighting global poverty
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12889597 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Thomas Pogge (0000-0001-9081-1314, Yale University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 512-526 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Law in Context (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-5523 • E-ISSN: 1744-5531 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1744552317000428 |
| OpenAlex | W2781871879 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
Many different indicators are used to monitor poverty and poverty-related deprivations. Two kinds of legitimacy worries may arise about any such indicator: one regarding its reliability as a measure of progress and another regarding the uses to which it is being put. This essay will touch upon both worries, beginning with the latter
Development economics · Economics · Legitimacy · Measure (data warehouse · Measuring poverty · Political science · Poverty · Reliability (semiconductor · Sociology · Computer Science · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law
| Citations per year | 0.18 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2009 - 2026 (18) |
| Highly cited | No |