Conversations between the proponents of the new paradigm of legal capacity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12889705 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Amita Dhanda (Nalsar University of Law, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 87-95 |
| Publication date | 2017-02-15 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Law in Context (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-5523 • E-ISSN: 1744-5531 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1744552316000501 |
| OpenAlex | W2588305045 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 6 |
In a bid to promote consensus, this response article parses the subtle difference of meaning and emphasis that subsists between the various proponents of the new paradigm of legal capacity by closely reading four articles included in this issue of the Journal
Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Meaning (existential · Political science · Positive economics · Reading (process · Sociology · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal Education and Practice Innovations · Philosophy
The Constitutional Court Ultra Petita as a Protection Form of Economic Rights in Pancasila Justice
Autonomy, Self-determination, and Human Rights
Vulnerable Capacity. Notes on a Quiet Legal Revolution
The Flag of Imagination
Supported Decision-Making from Theory to Practice
Cuidados gerontológicos de largo plazo. Los derechos de las personas mayores como meta política
| Citations per year | 0.67 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2017 - 2023 (7) |
| Highly cited | No |