Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Equality through precarious work regulation

Lessons from the domestic work debates in defence of the Standard Employment Relationship

Bibliographic Data

ID12889999
AuthorsDeirdre McCann (Durham University, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume10
Issue4
Pages507-521
Publication date2014-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Law in Context (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-5523 • E-ISSN: 1744-5531
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1744552314000251
OpenAlexW2053808095
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited17

Precarious work is a crucial impediment to substantive equality. This paper examines the regulation of precariousness in the light of two recent trends: the casualisation of employment in the wake of the crisis, and global efforts to regulate domestic work (e.g. ILO Domestic Workers Convention (No 189)). It takes these developments as an opportunity to explore the effective regulation of contemporary labour markets, and in particular the role of the Standard Employment Relationship (SER). The paper returns to two prominent accounts of the SER: Vosko's critique of SER-centrism in non-standard work regulation and Bosch's notion of the flexible-SER. It argues that the domestic work debates confirm the value of a modernised SER in its temporal dimensions. Yet the literature on precarious work tends to focus on regulatory settings in which the standard model remains dominant. The key contemporary challenge is to identify strategies that will embed this model in settings in which it is in decline or was never deep-rooted. Drawing on the notion of ‘reconstructive labour law’, the paper argues for innovative legal mechanisms that prompt the construction of flexibilised SER-type relationships. It concludes, however, that for these strategies to be effective, casualisation must be identified not only in contractual arrangements but also in working-time practices

Convention · Domestic work · Labour law · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Precarious work · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Work (physics · Employment and Welfare Studies · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Decent Care for Migrant Households

    Open Access•Matt Withers•Social Politics International…•2019

  • La relation entre le droit et la segmentation sexuée du marché du travail

    Open Access•Judy Fudge, Guy Mundlak•Revue internationale du Travail•2022

  • Regulating for Decent Work

    Open Access•Sangheon Lee, Deirdre McCann•Regulating for Decent Work•2011

  • Creative Labour Regulation

    Open Access•Deirdre McCann, Sangheon Lee et al.•Creative Labour Regulation•2014

  • Towards a New Standard Employment Relationship in Western Europe

    Open Access•Gerhard Bosch•British Journal of Industrial…•2004

  • Precarious Employment and the Problem of SER-Centrism in Regulating for Decent Work

    Open Access•L F Vosko•Regulating for Decent Work•2011

  • Gender and the Contours of Precarious Employment

    Leah F Vosko, Martha Macdonald et al.•Gender and the contours of…•2009

  • Less than adequate

    L F Vosko•Cambridge Journal of Regions…•2009

  • Reconstruction amid deconstruction

    Open Access•Jill Rubery•Work Employment and Society•2011

  • Temporary Work in Transnational Labor Regulation

    Open Access•L F Vosko•Social Indicators Research•2008

Citations per year0.29
Citation span2019 - 2022 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae