Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Policing, profiling and discrimination law

US and European approaches compared

Bibliographic Data

ID12892854
AuthorsAaron Baker (0000-0001-8744-2159, Durham University, corresponding author), Gavin Phillipson (0000-0002-9326-8983, Durham University)
Year2011
Volume7
Issue1
Pages105-124
Publication date2011-04-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Global Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-9626 • E-ISSN: 1744-9634
PublisherRoutledge (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17449626.2011.556142
OpenAlexW2087279606
LanguageEN
References cited11

Counter-terrorism officials in the USA and the UK responded to the events of 11 September 2001 and 7 July 2005 with an increasing resort to the use of ‘intelligence-led policing’ methods such as racial and religious profiling. Reliance on intelligence, to the effect that most people who commit a certain crime have a certain ethnicity, can lead to less favourable treatment of an individual with that ethnicity because of his membership in that group, not because of any act he is suspected or known to have committed. This paper explains the context in which intelligence-led policing flourishes, and how this discussion contributes to the profiling debate in both the USA and the UK, and then sets out two key contentions. First, we argue that Article 14 ECHR as applied under the UK Human Rights Act has a more protective, and less ‘prosecutorial’, conception of discrimination than has the US Equal Protection Clause, meaning that judges need not find a discriminatory motive to find that discrimination has occurred. Second, we contend that Article 14 provides the judiciary with the key tool of proportionality, which, when properly applied, makes it harder for discrimination to stand up to scrutiny

Commit · Criminology · Declaration · Disparate impact · Ethnic group · Human rights · Political science · Profiling (computer programming · Proportionality (law · Race (biology · Racial profiling · Racism · Scrutiny · Sociology · Supreme court · Terrorism · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions

  • The Culture of Control

    David Garland•Culture of Control•2001

  • The Social Amplification of Risk

    Open Access•Roger E Kasperson, Ortwin Renn et al.•Risk Analysis•1988

  • Pre-crime and post-criminology

    Open Access•Lucia Zedner•Theoretical Criminology•2007

  • Before the Next Attack

    G John Ikenberry, Bruce Ackerman•Foreign Affairs•2006

  • The Enjoyment of Rights and Freedoms

    Open Access•Aaron Baker•Modern Law Review•2006

  • Why terrorism works

    Alan M Dershowitz•Why terrorism works•2002

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae