Twenty-five years on
To move forward, we should return to Rawls’ The Law of Peoples
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 12893027 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ezekiel Vergara (0000-0003-2285-2020, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 91-98 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-02 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Global Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-9626 • E-ISSN: 1744-9634 |
| Publisher | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17449626.2024.2346649 |
| OpenAlex | W4398781724 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 20 |
In The Law of Peoples, John Rawls sets out his normative conception of global justice. The book remains a foundational text for scholars in the field. In recent years, however, new issues have arisen in the global justice literature, which Rawls did not consider. Moreover, his view has been rejected by many. So, as we move forward, does Rawls' The Law of Peoples deserve to retain this foundational status? I argue that we have two weighty reasons to afford it this status. As we consider the future directions of global justice, we should do so by returning to The Law of Peoples
Economic Justice · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Primary goods · Sociology · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Turkey's Politics and Society
The Oxford Handbook of Global Justice
Do Rawls's Two Theories of Justice Fit Together?
Rawls's Law of Peoples
Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls
National Responsibility and Global Justice
Rawls's Law of Peoples
A Theory of Justice
Global Justice
The Problem of Global Justice
Do Rawls's theories of justice fit together? A reply to Pogge
Nagel's Atlas
Aliens and Citizens
Distributive Justice, State Coercion, and Autonomy
Property Rights and the Resource Curse
Extra Rempublicam Nulla Justitia
An Egalitarian Law of Peoples
The Law of Peoples
| Highly cited | No |
|---|