Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Future proofing child protection social work

Bibliographic Data

ID12896913
AuthorsDavid Shemmings (0000-0002-4887-7034, University of Kent, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume12
Issue2-3
Pages202-210
Publication date2017-09-08
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Children s Services (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1746-6660 • E-ISSN: 2042-8677
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/jcs-06-2017-0025
OpenAlexW2751680402
LanguageEN
References cited10

Purpose How might the profession of child protection social work be “future proofed”, i.e. remain intact and of value beyond its present existence? The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach This is a discussion/“think piece” paper, in which the author argues that foregrounding the art and science of helping relationships is a way forward. Recognising and promoting the centrality of helping relationships is the direction in which the author believes (or is it hopes?) social work should head, because “more of the same” is not, in the author’s view, possible to sustain for much longer. Treading the well-worn but pot-holed path of box-ticking, endless risk assessment and perfunctory statutory visiting is likely to lead to continuing problems retaining social workers and, for those who do stay, increased burnout, compassion fatigue and secondary trauma, each of which interrupts or delays the development of working alliances with family members. Findings Growing reliance on thresholds and checklists to assess risk has served to increase referrals. As a result, social workers spend much of their time on triaging and filtering rather than working with the children and families that most need help and protection. Further, it is not what is in the practitioner’s toolkit that matters: rather, it is a defined set of personal skills and qualities that tips the balance to achieve lasting change. Thus, in order to “future proof” social work, we would do well to deepen our understanding of how helping relationships can lead to lasting change. Supporting social workers in this work is not just the responsibility of individual practitioners and their professional bodies, action also needs to be taken at governmental and managerial levels. Originality/value This is a discussion/“think piece”

Child protection · Foregrounding · Political science · Public relations · Set (abstract data type · Statutory law · Value (mathematics · Work (physics · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work

  • Relationship of Childhood Abuse and Household Dysfunction to Many of the Leading Causes of Death in Adults

    Open Access•Vincent J Felitti, Robert F Anda et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•1998

  • Handbook of Mentalization-Based Treatment

    Jon G Allen, Peter Fonagy•Handbook of Mentalization-Based…•2006

  • Socioeconomic inequalities and mental health problems in children and adolescents

    Franziska Reiß•Social Science & Medicine•2013

  • Professionals’ attitudes to children’s participation in decision‐making

    Open Access•Shemmings Shemmings•Child & Family Social Work•2000

  • Communication skills in child protection

    Open Access•Donald Forrester, Sophie Kershaw et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2007

  • Referrals and Child Protection in England

    Andy Bilson, Katie E C Martin•The British Journal of Social Work•2017

  • Mentalizing in Clinical Practice

    Jon G Allen, Peter Fonagy et al.•Mentalizing in Clinical Practice•2008

Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae