Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Partnership practice as collaborative knowledge work

Overcoming common dilemmas through an augmented view of professional expertise

Bibliographic Data

ID12896972
AuthorsN Hopwood (0000-0003-2149-5834, Stellenbosch University, corresponding author), Crispin Day (0000-0002-7655-7839, King's College London), A Edwards (0000-0002-4608-716X, University of Oxford)
Year2016
Volume11
Issue2
Pages111-123
Publication date2016-06-13
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Children s Services (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1746-6660 • E-ISSN: 2042-8677
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/jcs-08-2015-0027
OpenAlexW2422809713
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited22

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to shed new light on how partnership practices that build resilience in families work. Two broad questions are explored: first, what are the forms of expertise required in practices that effectively build resilience through partnership?; and second, how can some of the challenges practitioners experience when working in partnership be addressed? Design/methodology/approach – A theoretical approach is taken, framing partnership as collaborative knowledge work between practitioners and clients. Concepts of relational expertise, common knowledge and relational agency are explored as means to understand the forms of expertise involved in partnership. An empirical example is provided from practices guided by The Family Partnership Model, an approach that has been widely implemented. Findings – These concepts help to address three key challenges experienced by practitioners: client readiness for change, maintaining focus and purpose and using specialist expertise in partnership. This approach elucidates features of partnership practice that distinguish it from expert-led models, while highlighting diverse forms of expertise in play. Originality/value – The framework presented in this paper is distinctive and can be used to identify how practitioners can avoid common dilemmas, even in challenging circumstances with vulnerable families where practitioner-client relationships may be perceived as fragile. It counters the idea that partnership work dilutes professional expertise. Instead, an enriched and augmented view of professional expertise is presented

Agency (philosophy · Creativity · Engineering ethics · Framing (construction · General partnership · Knowledge management · Originality · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Value (mathematics · Community Health and Development · Computer Science · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Engineering · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice

  • Multi-professional development of youth workshop studification

    Open Access•Sirpa Ylimaula, Hanna Toiviainen•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2025

  • Double stimulation “in the wild”

    Open Access•N Hopwood, Belinda Gottschalk•Learning Culture and Social…•2017

  • Building trust with children in collaborative processes within in-home child welfare services

    Open Access•Ieva Salkauskiene, Inger Sofie Dahlø Husby et al.•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2026

  • Building common knowledge at the boundaries between professional practices

    Open Access•Anne Edwards•International Journal of…•2011

  • Relational agency

    Open Access•Anne Edwards•International Journal of…•2005

  • The role of common knowledge in achieving collaboration across practices

    Open Access•Anne Edwards•Learning Culture and Social…•2012

  • A Sociomaterial Account of Partnership, Signatures and Accountability in Practice

    Open Access•N Hopwood•Professions and Professionalism•2014

  • Relational agency in collaborations for the well‐being of children and young people

    Open Access•A Edwards•Journal of Children s Services•2009

  • Working Collaboratively to Build Resilience

    Open Access•A Edwards•Social Policy and Society•2007

  • The nurse–family partnership

    Open Access•David L Olds•Infant Mental Health Journal•2006

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2017 - 2026 (10)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae