Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Children of online grooming offenders

Secondary harms, lived impacts and service implications

Bibliographic Data

ID12896989
AuthorsAmanda Jayne Lancaster (Teesside University, corresponding author)
Year2026
Pages1-20
Publication date2026-03-11
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Children s Services (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1746-6660 • E-ISSN: 2042-8677
PublisherEmerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1108/jcs-06-2025-0030
OpenAlexW7134969245
LanguageEN
References cited53

Purpose Online child sexual abuse, which encompasses making and possessing explicit images of children (CSAM), online grooming (OG) with or without the intention to commit contact sexual offences and inciting children’s engagement in online sexual activities, is at a record high (Taddei, 2020). Such offences affect everyone involved, including the offenders’ families (adults and children) who typically face societal demonisation, judgement and ridicule (e.g. Rogers and Ferguson, 2011). The trauma experienced by these families has been evidenced (e.g. Armitage et al., 2023; Salter et al., 2022). This study aims to examine the impact experiences of children affected by child sexual abuse through offender association, particularly in the context of online grooming, within a field where empirical evidence remains limited. Design/methodology/approach This study used an anonymous online survey to examine the impact of online grooming on children residing with individuals suspected or convicted of online grooming offences, including stepchildren, grandchildren, step-grandchildren and siblings. The study was advertised on an online support forum for family and friends of people apprehended for online child sexual abuse offences. The survey, which included both validated outcome measures and open-ended questions was completed by 16 respondents. These included 14 proxy informants reporting their perception of children experiences (e.g. non-offending parents, guardians, grandparents, siblings), and two now adult children. Findings A thematic analysis of the qualitative data revealed four master themes: child development and familial disruption; silent endurance; societal opinion-pluralistic ignorance and abnormal identity formation. The findings indicate that current policies and practices should be revised to address the well-being of these secondary victims. Originality/value This study provides novel insights into children’s experiences of online grooming and their exposure to a family member’s apprehension, an area with limited prior research. Currently, these children are not recognised as secondary victims but rather as collateral damage − an unavoidable consequence of legal proceedings. As a result, policy fails to acknowledge their distress or provide formal support, leaving them vulnerable despite the profound emotional and psychological impact. By addressing these overlooked experiences, this study fills a critical gap in existing literature

Child abuse · Child sexual abuse · Commit · Context (archaeology · Ignorance · Judgement · Perception · Qualitative research · Sexual abuse · Thematic analysis · Child Abuse and Trauma · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

  • What is the profile of child exploitation material offenders?

    Rick Brown, Samantha Bricknell•2018

  • A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

    Leon Festinger•A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance•1957

  • The Children's Revised Impact of Event Scale (CRIES)

    Open Access•Sean Perrin, Richard Meiser-Stedman et al.•Behavioural and Cognitive…•2005

  • Impact of Event Scale

    Open Access•Eva C Sundin, Eva Sundin et al.•The British Journal of Psychiatry•2002

  • The Stigma Scale

    Open Access•Michael King, Sokratis Dinos et al.•The British Journal of Psychiatry•2007

  • Families and Incarceration

    Open Access•Joyce A Arditti•Families in Society The Journal…•2005

  • A Developmental Perspective on Children With Incarcerated Parents

    Open Access•Julie Poehlmann, K Turney•Child Development Perspectives•2021

  • The Impact of Event Scale

    Daniel S Weiss•Cross-Cultural Assessment of…•2007

  • Reactions of Nonoffending Parents to the Sexual Abuse of their Child

    Open Access•Ann N Elliott, Connie Nicholas Carnes•Child Maltreatment•2001

  • Families Shamed

    Rachel Condry•Families Shamed•2013

  • An In-Group Becomes Part of the Self

    Open Access•Eliot R Smith, Susan M Henry et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1996

  • Disenfranchised Grief and Nonfinite Loss as Experienced by the Families of Death Row Inmates

    Open Access•Sandra J Jones, Elizabeth Beck•OMEGA - Journal of Death and Dying•2007

  • Child Trauma Within the Context of Parental Incarceration

    Open Access•Joyce A Arditti•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2012

  • The Context and Process of Theory Development

    Open Access•Pauline Boss•Journal of Family Theory & Review•2016

  • Shame and blame

    Open Access•Douglas N Evans, Adam Trahan et al.•Criminology & Criminal Justice•2021

  • Digital degradation

    Open Access•Sarah Lageson, Sarah E Lageson et al.•Punishment & Society•2017

  • Conceptualizing the effects of imprisonment on families

    Open Access•Rachel Condry, Shona Minson•Theoretical Criminology•2020

  • You Feel Like You Did Something So Wrong”

    Open Access•Michael Salter, Delanie Woodlock et al.•Violence Against Women•2023

  • Women who remain in relationships with registered sexual offenders

    Open Access•Emma Jones, David Giles•Journal of Community & Applied…•2021

  • Paedophile Hunters’, Criminal Procedure, and Fundamental Human Rights

    Open Access•Joe Purshouse•Journal of Law and Society•2020

  • What does your dad do for a living? Children of prisoners and their experiences of stigma

    Open Access•Vicky Saunders•Children and Youth Services Review•2018

  • The relationship between witnessing arrests and elevated symptoms of posttraumatic stress

    Open Access•Susan D Phillips, Jian Zhao et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2010

  • Paternal Incarceration and Support for Children in Fragile Families

    Open Access•Amanda Geller, Irwin Garfinkel et al.•Demography•2011

  • The Collateral Consequences of Incarceration Revisited

    Open Access•Jillian J Turanovic, Nancy Rodríguez et al.•Criminology•2012

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • The infection of bad company

    John B Pryor, Glenn D Reeder et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2012

  • Despair by Association? The Mental Health of Mothers with Children by Recently Incarcerated Fathers

    Open Access•C Wildeman, J Schnittker et al.•American Sociological Review•2012

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae